...
首页> 外文期刊>Research & Politics >Gerrymandering or geography? How Democrats won the popular vote but lost the Congress in 2012:
【24h】

Gerrymandering or geography? How Democrats won the popular vote but lost the Congress in 2012:

机译:贵重物品或地理?民主党人如何赢得全民投票,但在2012年输掉了国会:

获取原文
           

摘要

This article assesses whether the antimajoritarian outcome in the 2012 US congressional elections was due more to deliberate partisan gerrymandering or asymmetric geographic distribution of partisans. The article first estimates an expected seatsa??votes slope by fitting past election results to a probit curve, and then measures how well parties performed in 2012 compared to this expectation in each state under various redistricting institutions. I find that while both parties exceeded expectations when controlling the redistricting process, a persistent pro-Republican bias is also present even when maps are drawn by courts or bipartisan agreement. This persistent bias is a greater factor in the nationwide disparity between seats and votes than intentional gerrymandering.
机译:本文评估了2012年美国国会大选的反对权主义结果是否更多是由于故意的党派游说或党派人士地理分布不对称所致。本文首先通过将过去的选举结果拟合到概率曲线来估计预期的席位,投票数斜率,然后衡量各州在各种限制机构下2012年的表现与该预期相比的表现。我发现,尽管双方在控制重新划分流程时都超出了预期,但即使法院或两党达成协议绘制地图,也存在着持久的共和党偏见。这种持续的偏见是造成全国席位和选票之间差异的一个重要因素,而不是有意的调皮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号