首页> 外文期刊>Rural and Remote Health >A simple, novel technique for fixing Penrose drains in minor surgeries, with advantages for remote outpatient clinics: a retrospective comparison with conventional drain fixation in North Ibaraki, Japan
【24h】

A simple, novel technique for fixing Penrose drains in minor surgeries, with advantages for remote outpatient clinics: a retrospective comparison with conventional drain fixation in North Ibaraki, Japan

机译:一种用于在小型外科手术中固定彭罗斯引流管的简单,新颖的技术,对于远程门诊诊所具有优势:与日本北茨城县的常规引流管固定术的回顾性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: In rural areas with few doctors, Penrose drains in minor surgeries for soft tissue trauma or small subcutaneous tumors are sometimes avoided, even though the drain would prevent hematoma, because of the limited availability of professional postsurgical care. The authors developed a simple fixation method for Penrose drains that can be used even in remote areas where a doctor is not present to remove the drain. A retrospective study was conducted to compare this new method of fixing Penrose drains with instances in which the Penrose drain was fixed to skin by conventional suturing. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent minor surgeries using Penrose drains were reviewed. The surgeries were performed from April 2012 to March 2015 in remote outpatient clinics in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. The cases were divided into two groups: those using the new method, in which the Penrose drains were sewn onto the wound dressings and could be automatically removed while changing the dressing, and those in which the Penrose drains were conventionally fixed to the skin and removed one or several days after surgery by another doctor at the outpatient clinic. The rates of drain-related complications and of automatic drain removal (ie removal without a doctor's assistance) between the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 54 Penrose drains used for 48 lesions in 44 patients (25 men, 19 women) in the new-method group, and 36 Penrose drains for 25 lesions in 21 patients (12 men, 9 women) in the conventional-method (control) group were analyzed. All 54 Penrose drains in the new-method group were removed automatically, while none of the 36 drains in the control group were removed automatically. There were no drain-related complications, such as massive hematoma, retrograde infection, seroma, or drain breakage or straying, in any of the new-method or control cases. Conclusions: This new Penrose-drain fixation method is safe and is particularly suitable for minor surgeries in rural areas where there are no resident doctors. The wide use of this method for appropriate minor surgeries in doctorless rural areas has the potential to reduce surgical complications and the time burden for both patients and surgeons.
机译:简介:在医生很少的农村地区,有时由于软组织创伤或皮下小肿瘤而避免在小手术中使用彭罗斯引流管,尽管引流管可预防血肿,但由于专业的术后护理服务有限。作者开发了一种简单的Penrose排水管固定方法,该方法甚至可以在没有医生去除排水管的偏远地区使用。进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较这种固定彭罗斯引流管的新方法与通过常规缝合将彭罗斯引流管固定在皮肤上的情况。方法:回顾了使用彭罗斯引流管进行小手术的患者的病历。该手术于2012年4月至2015年3月在日本茨城县的偏远门诊进行。病例分为两类:使用新方法的病例,其中将彭罗斯引流管缝在伤口敷料上,可以在更换敷料时自动去除,而常规情况下将彭罗斯引流管固定在皮肤上并除去另一名医生在门诊诊所手术后一或几天。比较了两组之间的引流相关并发症发生率和自动引流清除率(即在没有医生协助下进行引流)。结果:在新方法组中,共有54例Penrose引流管用于44例患者(48例男性,19例女性)的48个病变,而在常规方法中,36例Penrose引流管用于21例患者(12例男性,9例女性)的25个病变方法(对照组)进行分析。新方法组中的所有54个Penrose排水管均自动清除,而对照组中的36个排水管均未自动清除。在任何新方法或对照病例中,都没有与引流有关的并发症,例如大血肿,逆行感染,血清肿,引流管破裂或散乱。结论:这种新的彭罗斯引流固定方法是安全的,特别适合于没有常驻医生的农村地区的小型手术。在无医生的农村地区,这种方法广泛用于适当的小型外科手术,有可能减少手术并发症并减少患者和外科医生的时间负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号