...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology International >Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
【24h】

Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels

机译:用当前感知阈值测量尿感:极限方法和水平方法之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT).Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz (corresponding to A-β, A-δ, and C fibers, resp.) both pre- and postoperatively. Threshold values were obtained in all patients by using the method of limits and the method of levels.Results. CPT values obtained by using the method of levels and the methods of limits were highly correlated at all frequencies before and after surgery (ρ=0.93–0.99,P<0.0001). The mean threshold values obtained by the method of levels were significantly lower at all frequencies compared with those obtained by the method of limits.Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the method of levels is more sensitive for the detection of CPTs compared to the method of limits.
机译:目的。确定在下尿路(LUT)中获得当前感知阈值(CPT)的两种方法之间的关联。材料和方法。接受盆腔手术的21名妇女接受了CPT尿道检查。术前和术后均在2,000、250和5 Hz(分别对应于A-β,A-δ和C纤维)上测量CPT。采用极限法和水平法求得所有患者的阈值。使用水平方法和极限方法获得的CPT值在手术前后的各个频率上都高度相关(ρ= 0.93–0.99,P <0.0001)。与通过极限方法获得的平均阈值相比,在所有频率下通过水平方法获得的平均阈值均显着较低。我们的发现表明,水平法比限度法对CPT的检测更为敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号