首页> 外文期刊>Rural and Remote Health >Women's health care: the experiences and behaviors of rural and urban lesbians in the USA
【24h】

Women's health care: the experiences and behaviors of rural and urban lesbians in the USA

机译:妇女保健:美国农村和城市女同性恋者的经验和行为

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Previous research has consistently demonstrated that, in comparison to their cisgender heterosexual counterparts, lesbians face a multitude of women's healthcare-related disparities. However, very little research has been conducted that takes an intersectionality approach to examining the potential influences of rural-urban location on the health-related needs and experiences of lesbians. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare rural and urban lesbians' access to women's health care, experiences with women's healthcare providers (WHCPs), and preventive behavior using a large, diverse sample of lesbians from across the USA. Methods: A total of 895 (31.1% rural and 68.9% urban) lesbian-identified cisgender women (ie not transgender) from the USA participated in the current online study. As part of a larger parent study, participants were recruited from across the USA through email communication to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-focused organizations and online advertisements. Participants were asked to complete a series of questions related to their women's healthcare-related experiences and behaviors (ie access to care, experiences with WHCPs, and preventive behavior). A series of χ2 analyses were utilized in order to examine rural-urban differences across dependent variables. Results: An examination of sexual risks revealed that relatively more rural lesbians reported at least one previous male sexual partner in comparison to the urban sample of lesbians (78.1% vs 69.1%, χ2(1, N =890)=7.56, p =0.006). A similarly low percentage of rural (42.4%) and urban (42.9%) lesbians reported that they have a WHCP that they see on a regular basis for preventive care. In terms of experiences with WHCP providers, relatively fewer rural lesbians indicated that their current WHCP had discussed/recommended the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in comparison to urban lesbians (27.5% vs. 37.2%; χ2 (1, N=796)=7.24, p =0.007). No other rural-urban differences in experiences with WHCPs emerged - few rural and urban lesbians had been asked about their sexual orientation by their WHCP (38.8% and 45.0%, respectively), been provided with appropriate safe-sex education by their WHCP (21.4% and 25.3%), had their last HIV/sexually transmitted infection screening instigated by their WHCP (if applicable; 15.7% and 19.5%), and reported that their WHCP seems knowledgeable about lesbian health concerns (56.5% vs 54.6%). In terms of preventive behavior, significantly fewer rural lesbians aged 40 years or more had received a mammogram in the past 3 years (63.2% vs 83.2%; χ2(1, N =163)=8.36, p =0.004) when compared to their urban counterparts. No other significant rural-urban differences in preventive behaviors emerged. A similarly low percentage of rural and urban lesbians indicated that they have received the HPV vaccination (22.8% and 29.0%, respectively) and/or have had a HIV/STI screening (43.0% and 47.8%), Pap test (62.0% and 64.5%) or breast exam (59.2% and 62.8%), in the past 3 years. Conclusions: The current findings highlight that rural lesbians in the USA, in comparison to urban lesbians, may experience elevated health risks related to being more likely to have at least one previous male sexual partner, less likely to be recommended the HPV vaccination by a WHCP, and, for those 40 or older, less likely to receive routine mammogram screenings. Furthermore, rural lesbians appear to engage in similarly low rates of HPV vaccination and regular HIV/STI screenings, Pap tests, and clinical breast exams as their urban counterparts. Given the increased cervical and breast cancer risks associated with rural living, the current findings underscore the dire need for health promotion efforts aimed at increasing rural lesbians' engagement in routine pelvic and breast exams.
机译:简介:先前的研究一直证明,与同性别的同性异性恋者相比,女同性恋者面临着许多与女性医疗保健相关的差异。但是,很少有研究采用交叉性方法来研究城乡布局对女同性恋者健康相关需求和经历的潜在影响。这项研究的目的是使用来自美国各地的大量不同的女同性恋者,定量比较农村和城市女同性恋者获得妇女医疗保健的机会,与女医护人员的经历以及预防行为。方法:来自美国的总共895名(由女性组成的非变性人)女性(即非跨性别)女性(即非变性者)参加了该在线研究,其中895名(农村地区占31.1%,城市地区占68.9%)。作为较大的一项父项研究的一部分,参与者通过电子邮件与美国,同性恋,双性恋和变性者(LGBT)为主的组织进行电子邮件交流,并从美国各地招募参与者,并在网上投放广告。要求参与者完成一系列与妇女的医疗保健相关经历和行为有关的问题(即获得护理,WHCP的经历以及预防行为)。为了检验因变量之间的城乡差异,使用了一系列的χ 2 分析。结果:对性风险的调查显示,与城市女同性恋者相比,农村女同性恋者中至少有一位以前曾有过男性性伴侣(78.1%vs 69.1%,χ 2 (1,N = 890)= 7.56,p = 0.006)。在农村(42.4%)和城市(42.9%)的女同性恋者中,有相当低的比例报告说,他们定期接受WHCP预防保健。从与WHCP提供者的经验来看,与城市女同性恋者相比,相对较少的农村女同性恋者表示他们当前的WHCP已经讨论/推荐了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种(27.5%对37.2%;χ 2 (1,N = 796)= 7.24,p = 0.007)。 WHCP的经历没有其他城乡差异-WHCP很少询问城乡女同性恋者的性取向(分别为38.8%和45.0%),并由其WHCP提供了适当的安全性教育(21.4 %和25.3%),他们的WHCP发起了他们最近一次的HIV /性传播感染筛查(如果适用; 15.7%和19.5%),并报告说他们的WHCP似乎了解女同性恋健康问题(56.5%vs 54.6%)。在预防行为方面,过去3年中接受乳房X线检查的40岁或以上的农村女同性恋者明显减少(63.2%对83.2%;χ 2 (1,N = 163)= 8.36, p = 0.004)。在预防行为上,没有出现其他城乡差异。与此类似,农村和城市的女同性恋者所占比例较低,表明他们已经接受了HPV疫苗接种(分别为22.8%和29.0%)和/或接受了HIV / STI筛查(43.0%和47.8%),巴氏试验(62.0%和过去3年内(64.5%)或乳房检查(59.2%和62.8%)。结论:目前的研究结果表明,与城市女同性恋者相比,美国的农村女同性恋者可能面临较高的健康风险,这与以前有至少一个男性性伴侣的可能性更高,WHCP建议的HPV疫苗接种可能性较小有关,对于40岁或40岁以上的人群,则不太可能接受常规的乳房X光检查。此外,农村女同性恋者与城市女同性恋者的HPV疫苗接种率和定期HIV / STI筛查,巴氏检测和临床乳房检查的发生率相似。鉴于与农村生活相关的子宫颈癌和乳腺癌风险增加,当前的发现强调了为促进农村女同性恋者进行常规骨盆和乳房检查而进行的健康促进工作的迫切需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号