首页> 外文期刊>Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgies >Influence of trauma origin site on admission rates of patients submitted to emergency laparotomy.
【24h】

Influence of trauma origin site on admission rates of patients submitted to emergency laparotomy.

机译:创伤起源部位对急诊剖腹手术患者入院率的影响。

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: to evaluate the influence of the site of trauma occurrence on the trauma scores of patients submitted to emergency laparotomy. Methods: this is a retrospective, observational, analytical study. We included 212 patients who underwent exploratory laparotomies in the period of January 2015 and December 2017. We obtained information about the accident site and vital data of the patients based on data collection through electronic and physical records. We analyzed the trauma indices of patients from Curitiba and its Metropolitan Region and the place where the patient was rescued (physical establishment or public road). Results: among the 212 patients studied, 184 (86.7%) were brought by the Prehospital Care Service from the city of Curitiba, and 28 (13.3%), from the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba. Twenty-five patients (17.6%) were rescued in physical establishments, while 117 (82.4%) were rescued on public roads. We observed higher values ??of Injurity Severity Scores (ISS) in patients coming from the Metropolitan Region than in those coming from Curitiba (29.78 vs 22.46, P=0.009), but higher values ??of Trauma and Injury Severity Scores (TRISS) in patients from Curitiba than the ones from the Metropolitan Region (90.62 vs 81.30, P=0.015). Patients rescued in public roads presented lower Revised Trauma Scores (RTS) (6.96 vs 7.65, P=0.024) and TRISS (86.42 vs 97.21; P=0.012). Conclusion: trauma victims from sites more distant from the referral center and rescued on public roads presented worse prognosis.
机译:目的:评估创伤发生部位对急诊剖腹手术患者创伤评分的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性,观察性,分析性研究。我们纳入了212位在2015年1月和2017年12月进行探索性开腹手术的患者。我们通过电子和物理记录收集了有关事故现场和患者生命数据的信息。我们分析了库里提巴(Curitiba)及其大都会地区以及患者获救的地点(物理设施或公共道路)患者的创伤指数。结果:在研究的212名患者中,有184名(86.7%)来自库里提巴市的院前护理服务,而28名(13.3%)来自库里提巴大都会地区。在实体机构中救出了25名患者(17.6%),在公共道路上救出了117名患者(82.4%)。我们观察到来自大都会地区的患者的伤害严重度评分(ISS)值高于来自库里提巴的患者(29.78 vs 22.46,P = 0.009),但创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)值较高来自库里蒂巴的患者比大城市地区的患者(90.62比81.30,P = 0.015)。在公共道路上获救的患者的较低的修订创伤评分(RTS)(6.96 vs 7.65,P = 0.024)和TRISS(86.42 vs 97.21; P = 0.012)。结论:远离转诊中心地点并在公共道路上获救的创伤受害者的预后较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号