首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >Artigo original Abordagem anterior aberta versus artroscópica no tratamento do impacto femoroacetabular: estudo caso‐controle com seguimento mínimo de dois anos Open versus arthroscopic approach in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a case‐control study with two‐years follow up ☆
【24h】

Artigo original Abordagem anterior aberta versus artroscópica no tratamento do impacto femoroacetabular: estudo caso‐controle com seguimento mínimo de dois anos Open versus arthroscopic approach in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: a case‐control study with two‐years follow up ☆

机译:原始文章开放式与关节镜下方法治疗股骨髋臼撞击症:至少两年随访的病例对照研究开放式与关节镜下方法治疗股骨髋臼撞击症:病例对照研究,两年随访☆

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To compare clinical and imaging results and complications between patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) who underwent either anterior open surgery or an arthroscopic approach, with a minimum follow‐up of two years. Methods This retrospective case‐control study included patients submitted to FAI surgical treatment between November 2007 and March 2012. Patients treated with open surgery were compared with those treated with arthroscopy. Patients were clinically assessed by the modified Harris Hip Score, Non‐Arthritic Hip Score, and internal hip rotation. Patients were radiographically assessed by the center‐edge angle, joint space width, alpha angle, neck‐head index, degree of arthrosis, and presence of heterotopic ossification of the hip. Results In the study period, 56 patients (58 hips) with FAI were included; 16 underwent open surgery and 40 underwent arthroscopy. The 40 patients treated by the arthroscopic route had a mean follow‐up of 29.1 months, and 75.6% presented good or excellent clinical results. The radiographic evaluation parameters progressed to normal levels. The 16 patients who underwent open surgery had a mean follow‐up of 52 months, and 70.58% presented good or excellent clinical results. The radiographic evaluation parameters progressed to normal levels. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were considered similar in both groups. Conclusions Arthroscopy and open surgery treatments for FAI provided comparable clinical and radiographic results. However, a higher rate of complications was observed in the open surgery group.
机译:目的比较接受前路开放手术或关节镜检查且至少随访两年的接受股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)治疗的患者的临床和影像学结果以及并发症。方法这项回顾性病例对照研究包括2007年11月至2012年3月接受FAI手术治疗的患者。将接受开放手术的患者与接受关节镜检查的患者进行比较。通过改良的Harris髋关节评分,非关节炎髋关节评分和髋关节内部旋转对患者进行临床评估。通过中心边缘角,关节间隙宽度,α角,颈头指数,关节炎程度和髋部异位骨化的影像学评估患者。结果在研究期间,纳入了56例(58髋)FAI患者; 16例接受了开放手术,40例接受了关节镜检查。经关节镜途径治疗的40例患者平均随访29.1个月,其中75.6%的患者表现良好或出色的临床结果。射线照相评估参数发展到正常水平。 16例接受了开放手术的患者平均接受了52个月的随访,其中70.58%的患者表现良好或出色。射线照相评估参数发展到正常水平。两组的术后临床和影像学结果相似。结论FAI的关节镜检查和开放手术治疗提供了可比的临床和影像学结果。然而,在开放手术组中观察到更高的并发症发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号