...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas >Plágio nos trabalhos acadêmicos: proposta de políticas institucionais de integridade
【24h】

Plágio nos trabalhos acadêmicos: proposta de políticas institucionais de integridade

机译:学术工作中的窃:关于机构诚信政策的建议

获取原文
           

摘要

The practice of plagiarism, besides being reprehensible, is offensive to academic integrity. Even though it is extremely disapproved of, the spread of the use of plagiarism in end of course monographs and papers has been increasingly observed. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how doctrines, universities and jurisprudence have dealt with the issue and to present some proposals for plagiarism regulation in academia. It was observed that few universities have clear rules on the identification and punishment of plagiarism in academic texts. Even when they do exist, they are not always accompanied by a jurisprudential understanding on the identifying elements of the practice of plagiarism. From a study on the standards set by research funding agencies and decisions on the subject, suggestions are presented for the regulation of punishment regarding this practice in the academic realm. We conclude that plagiarism has been treated as if it were a teacher problem, when, in fact, it is an institutional problem. Respect for academic ethics should be a goal for all and the debate on the subject should involve both teachers and students.
机译:being窃的做法除了应受谴责之外,还冒犯了学术诚信。尽管非常不赞成,但越来越多地发现抄袭的使用在课程专着和论文的结尾逐渐普及。本文的目的是讨论学说,大学和法学如何处理这个问题,并提出一些学术界对窃行为进行监管的建议。据观察,很少有大学在学术文献中对the窃的识别和惩罚有明确的规定。即使存在,它们也不总是伴随着对of窃行为识别要素的法理学理解。通过对研究资助机构设定的标准进行研究并就该主题做出决定,提出了有关在学术领域对此行为进行处罚的建议。我们得出的结论是,when窃实际上已被视为老师的问题,而实际上这是制度上的问题。尊重学术道德应该是所有人的目标,有关该主题的辩论应包括师生双方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号