首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Populao >Compara??o dos diferentes métodos de avalia??o da seguran?a alimentar e nutricional domiciliar na zona rural de uma cidade brasileiraComparación de los diferentes métodos de evaluación de la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional domiciliar en el área rural
【24h】

Compara??o dos diferentes métodos de avalia??o da seguran?a alimentar e nutricional domiciliar na zona rural de uma cidade brasileiraComparación de los diferentes métodos de evaluación de la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional domiciliar en el área rural

机译:比较巴西城市农村地区家庭食品和营养安全的各种评估方法农村地区家庭食品和营养安全的不同评估方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To evaluate and compare household food security situations in the rural area of a Brazilian city by three different methods: Availability of food energy at home, nutritional status and Perception of food insecurity. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 79 families living in 19 rural communities in a small city in Minas Gerais, Brazil, including a total of 272 residents. Families were selected by drawing lots, respecting the proportionality of families per community. The inclusion criteria included living in rural areas, inhabiting a selected household, and using food products available for consumption, by purchase and production. During family visits, nutritional status was analyzed by anthropometry, the perception of food insecurity by Food Insecurity Scale (EBIA) and availability of food energy at household for 30 days. Results: Of the 79 families of family farmers, 12.7% were considered to be unsafe for availability of food energy at household, 24.0% due to the presence of low weight at the household and 49.5% by EBIA. There was a low correlation among the methods, with differences between them (Kendall W 0.162 p 0.001). Food insecurity was associated to the presence of at least one individual aged less than 18 years old in the household. Food security classified according to EBIA was associated with an increase in the number of people living in the household, the production of vegetables and fruits. Conclusions: No single indicator can cover several dimensions of food security. Food Security involves a broad and multifaceted approach; therefore, its thorough evaluation requires different classification methods.
机译:目的:通过三种不同的方法评估和比较巴西城市农村地区的家庭粮食安全状况:在家中获取食物的能量,营养状况和对粮食不安全的认识。方法:对巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州一个小城市中19个农村社区中的79个家庭进行的横断面研究,其中包括272名居民。通过抽签选择家庭,同时尊重每个社区的家庭比例。纳入标准包括居住在农村地区,居住在选定的家庭中以及使用通过购买和生产可消费的食品。在家庭探视期间,通过人体测量法分析营养状况,通过食品不安全量表(EBIA)对食物不安全感进行感知,并在家庭中获取食物能量30天。结果:在79个家庭农民家庭中,有12.7%的人认为家庭食物能量的安全是不安全的,有24.0%的人认为家庭中的体重很低,而EBIA则有49.5%。这些方法之间的相关性很低,并且之间存在差异(Kendall W 0.162 p <0.001)。粮食不安全与家庭中至少有一名年龄小于18岁的人有关。根据EBIA分类的食品安全与家庭人口的增加,蔬菜和水果的生产有关。结论:没有一个单一的指标可以涵盖粮食安全的多个方面。粮食安全涉及广泛和多方面的方法;因此,对其进行全面评估需要不同的分类方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号