首页> 外文期刊>Research Involvement and Engagement >‘A group of totally awesome people who do stuff’ - a qualitative descriptive study of a children and young people’s patient and public involvement endeavour
【24h】

‘A group of totally awesome people who do stuff’ - a qualitative descriptive study of a children and young people’s patient and public involvement endeavour

机译:“一群做事非常出色的人”-对儿童和年轻人的耐心和公众参与努力的定性描述性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundIn 2013, the Cambridge Clinical Research Facility (CCRF) set up a Children’s Non-Executive Research Board to advise on service and facility development and research involving children and young people (CYP). In 2015, the Children’s Experiences of Engaging in Research study (CHEER) was conceived to explore the Children’s Board as a patient and public involvement initiative.AimTo explore the views of CYP, staff and parents involved in the Children’s Board with the view to describe their experiences of the selected mechanism of involvement (Children’s Board) within the context of operation (CCRF).MethodsA qualitative descriptive methodology involving qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews was used to derive descriptive summaries of the interview data.Setting and participantsInterviews were carried out with staff ( n ?=?5), children ( n ?=?2) and parents (n?=?2) who participated in the first or second Children’s Board meetings.ResultsTwelve descriptive summaries emerged: (1) CCRF ‘role’ perspective (2) purpose, remit and future direction (3) aspirations (4) learning as reciprocation (5) regular meetings, contact and feedback (6) expectation setting and ground rules (7) culture of PPI (8) surprise, underestimation and self-selection (9) reciprocity, incentivisation and participation (10) practicalities, timing and barriers (11) parental roles (12) event structure. These highlighted the importance of selecting the right mechanism of involvement in relation to context for involvement and the reductive biases adults and healthcare providers may unconsciously hold. Both of?these aspects?may affect the efficacy of PPI endeavours with CYP.Discussion and conclusionsMechanisms by which CYP are involved in research should be considered from the outset; taking into consideration both the setting and contextual features. Contextual and process factors important in the adult PPI realm were generally observed in this PPI initiative with CYP; however further research is required to explore unconscious biases and reductive perceptions in adult facilitators.
机译:背景技术2013年,剑桥临床研究机构(CCRF)成立了儿童非执行研究委员会,就涉及儿童和青少年(CYP)的服务和设施开发与研究提供建议。 2015年,``儿童参与研究经历''(CHEER)旨在探讨儿童委员会是一项耐心和公众参与的举措。旨在探讨CYP的观点,参与儿童委员会的工作人员和父母,以描述他们的观点方法(CCRF)中选择参与机制(儿童委员会)的经验。方法使用定性描述方法,包括对半结构化访谈的定性内容分析,以得出访谈数据的描述性摘要。背景和参与者进行访谈由参加第一次或第二次儿童委员会会议的工作人员(n = 5),孩子(n = 2)和父母(n = 2)组成。结果出现了十二个描述性摘要:(1)CCRF“角色”观点(2)目的,职权范围和未来方向(3)理想(4)往复学习(5)定期会议,联系和反馈(6)期望设定和基本规则(7)崇拜PPI的确定性(8)惊喜,低估和自我选择(9)互惠,激励和参与(10)实用性,时机和障碍(11)父母角色(12)事件结构。这些突出显示了根据参与环境选择正确的参与机制的重要性,并且成年人和医疗服务提供者可能会在不知不觉中保持减少的偏见。这两个方面都可能影响CYP对PPI的功效。讨论与结论应当从一开始就考虑CYP参与研究的机制。同时考虑设置和上下文特征。通常在该CYP的PPI计划中观察到对成人PPI领域重要的情境和过程因素。然而,需要进一步的研究来探索成人促进者的无意识偏见和还原感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号