...
首页> 外文期刊>Leukemia >Comparison between anagrelide and hydroxycarbamide in their activities against haematopoietic progenitor cell growth and differentiation: selectivity of anagrelide for the megakaryocytic lineage
【24h】

Comparison between anagrelide and hydroxycarbamide in their activities against haematopoietic progenitor cell growth and differentiation: selectivity of anagrelide for the megakaryocytic lineage

机译:阿那格雷利和羟基脲对造血祖细胞生长和分化活性的比较:阿那格雷利对巨核细胞谱系的选择性

获取原文
           

摘要

Anagrelide (ANA) and hydroxycarbamide (HC) are two distinct pharmacological agents used to treat thrombocythaemia associated with myeloproliferative disorders. Although both drugs have been in clinical use for a number of years, comparative studies of their selectivity and mode of action are still lacking. Here, we have evaluated the activities of ANA and HC on the growth and differentiation of human haematopoietic progenitor cells in liquid culture. Both drugs inhibited thrombopoietin-induced megakaryocytopoiesis in a dose-dependent manner, but with strikingly different potencies (IC50=26nM for ANA and 30M for HC) and modes of action. Whereas HC inhibited cell proliferation, ANA acted primarily on the differentiation process. At doses that abrogated megakaryocytopoiesis, HC also inhibited the expansion of CD34+ cells stimulated by stem cell factor, interleukin-3 and Flt-3 ligand and also induced apoptosis. Furthermore, HC inhibited erythroid and myelomonocytic cell growth, induced by erythropoietin or granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor, respectively. In contrast, ANA showed none of these additional effects. Taken together, these results demonstrate that ANA is a potent and selective inhibitor of megakaryocytopoiesis, having no significant activity against haematopoietic progenitor cell expansion or differentiation into other lineages. In contrast, the anti-megakaryocytopoietic activity of HC cannot be dissociated from its more general cytoreductive and cytotoxic actions.
机译:Anagrelide(ANA)和hydroxycarbamide(HC)是用于治疗与骨髓增生性疾病相关的血小板增多症的两种不同药理剂。尽管这两种药物已经在临床上使用了多年,但仍缺乏对其选择性和作用方式的比较研究。在这里,我们已经评估了ANA和HC在液体培养中对人类造血祖细胞生长和分化的活性。两种药物均以剂量依赖的方式抑制血小板生成素诱导的巨核细胞生成,但作用力显着不同(ANA的IC50 = 26nM,HC的30M)。 HC抑制细胞增殖,而ANA主要作用于分化过程。在废除巨核细胞生成的剂量下,HC还抑制了干细胞因子,白介素3和Flt-3配体刺激的CD34 +细胞的扩增,还诱导了细胞凋亡。此外,HC分别抑制由促红细胞生成素或粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子诱导的红系和骨髓单核细胞生长。相比之下,全日空没有表现出这些额外的影响。综上所述,这些结果表明ANA是强核细胞生成的有效和选择性抑制剂,对造血祖细胞的扩增或向其他谱系的分化没有显着活性。相反,HC的抗巨核细胞生成活性不能从其更普遍的细胞还原和细胞毒性作用中解离出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号