首页> 外文期刊>Land >Chiefs in a Democracy: A Case Study of the ‘New’ Systems of Regulating Firewood Harvesting in Post-Apartheid South Africa
【24h】

Chiefs in a Democracy: A Case Study of the ‘New’ Systems of Regulating Firewood Harvesting in Post-Apartheid South Africa

机译:民主酋长:南非后种族隔离时期“新”的监管柴火采伐制度的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Much of the international commons literature reveals a decreased functioning of local traditional institutions that regulate natural resource harvesting. In South Africa, it is believed that the creation of new democratic structures at the end of Apartheid has contributed significantly to the deterioration in traditional resource regulation and this in turn has led to the extensive resource degradation seen in parts of the country. Many of these assertions, though, remain anecdotal in nature. Given the high reliance by rural households on natural resources, and the serious negative implications that over-use has on livelihood security, understanding how well or poorly such commons are regulated is key to ensuring the sustainability of such resource-dependent populations. The aim of this study was therefore to examine systems of resource governance, focusing specifically on firewood, and to determine the roles of traditional and democratically elected community leaders in six rural villages spanning two chieftaincies in Bushbuckridge, South Africa. In each study village, five local leaders were interviewed and five community focus groups were conducted. Results indicate that most parties still regard the Chief as the ultimate authority for regulating firewood harvesting. However, overall firewood management appears weak, at best, across the region. Although some authors attribute this to community confusion over the roles of local leaders in a new democracy, we provide evidence that other socio-political factors, including political expediency, may be driving the increasingly relaxed implementation of these firewood management systems. With resource dependence remaining a vital contributor to livelihood security across the developing world and with many rural communities facing increasing strain under local resource depletion, these findings shed new light on the complex social dynamics underlying the widely reported weakening of traditional institutions in South Africa. In so doing, it offers insights into local firewood governance that can be used to combat these challenges and thereby reduce regional social and ecological vulnerability being experienced in communal landscapes across the region.
机译:国际上许多公共文献都表明,调节自然资源采伐的地方传统机构的职能下降。在南非,人们认为,在种族隔离制度结束时建立新的民主结构,对传统资源管理的恶化做出了重大贡献,而这反过来又导致了该国部分地区广泛的资源退化。但是,其中许多断言本质上仍然是轶事。鉴于农村家庭对自然资源的高度依赖,以及过度使用对生计安全的严重负面影响,了解此类公共区域受到何种程度的监管是确保此类依赖资源的人口可持续发展的关键。因此,本研究的目的是研究资源治理体系,特别是针对柴火,并确定跨越南非布什巴里奇两个首领的六个乡村中的传统民选社区领导人的作用。在每个研究村中,对五位当地领导人进行了采访,并开展了五个社区焦点小组。结果表明,大多数政党仍将酋长视为调节柴火收割的最终权力。但是,整个地区的木柴总体管理状况似乎最好。尽管有些作者将这归因于社区对新民主制中地方领导人的​​角色的困惑,但我们提供的证据表明,其他社会政治因素,包括政治上的权宜之计,可能正在推动这些薪柴管理系统的实施越来越宽松。由于对资源的依赖仍然是整个发展中世界的生计安全的重要因素,而且许多农村社区在当地资源枯竭下面临越来越大的压力,这些发现为复杂的社会动力提供了新的亮点,这些社会动力是南非传统机构衰落的普遍报道。通过这样做,它提供了对当地薪柴治理的见解,可用于应对这些挑战,从而减少整个地区公共景观中遇到的地区社会和生态脆弱性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号