...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Long-term functional improvements in the 2-year treatment of schizophrenia outpatients with olanzapine long-acting injection
【24h】

Long-term functional improvements in the 2-year treatment of schizophrenia outpatients with olanzapine long-acting injection

机译:奥氮平长效注射液治疗精神分裂症门诊患者2年的长期功能改善

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Little is known about the long-term changes in the functioning of schizophrenia patients receiving maintenance therapy with olanzapine long-acting injection (LAI), and whether observed changes differ from those seen with oral olanzapine.Methods: This study describes changes in the levels of functioning among outpatients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine-LAI compared with oral olanzapine over 2?years. This was a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-year study comparing the long-term treatment effectiveness of monthly olanzapine-LAI (405?mg/4?weeks; n=264) with daily oral olanzapine (10?mg/day; n=260). Levels of functioning were assessed with the Heinrichs–Carpenter Quality of Life Scale. Functional status was also classified as “good”, “moderate”, or “poor”, using a previous data-driven approach. Changes in functional levels were assessed with McNemar’s test and comparisons between olanzapine-LAI and oral olanzapine employed the Student’s t-test. Results: Over the 2-year study, the patients treated with olanzapine-LAI improved their level of functioning (per Quality of Life total score) from 64.0–70.8?(P<0.001). Patients on oral -olanzapine also increased their level of functioning from 62.1–70.1?(P<0.001). At baseline, 19.2% of the olanzapine-LAI-treated patients had a “good” level of functioning, which increased to 27.5% (P<0.05). The figures for oral olanzapine were 14.2% and 24.5%, respectively (P<0.001). Results did not significantly differ between olanzapine-LAI and oral olanzapine. Conclusion: In this 2-year, open-label, randomized study of olanzapine-LAI, outpatients with schizophrenia maintained or improved their favorable baseline level of functioning over time. Results did not significantly differ between olanzapine-LAI and oral olanzapine.
机译:背景:关于接受奥氮平长效注射剂(LAI)维持治疗的精神分裂症患者功能的长期变化以及所观察到的变化与口服奥氮平所见的变化是否知之甚少。与口服奥氮平相比,用奥氮平-LAI治疗的精神分裂症门诊患者2年以上的功能水平。这是对一项多中心,随机,开放标签,为期2年研究的数据的二次分析,该研究比较了每月口服olanzapine和每月口服olanzapine(405?mg / 4?周; n = 264)的长期治疗效果(10?mg /天; n = 260)。使用Heinrichs-Carpenter生活质量量表评估功能水平。使用以前的数据驱动方法,功能状态也被分为“好”,“中”或“差”。通过McNemar的测试评估了功能水平的变化,并使用Student t检验比较了奥氮平-LAI与口服奥氮平之间的比较。结果:在为期2年的研究中,奥氮平-LAI治疗的患者的功能水平(按生活质量总分计)从64.0–70.8?改善(P <0.001)。口服奥氮平的患者的功能水平也从62.1-70.1?升高(P <0.001)。在基线时,奥氮平-LAI治疗的患者中有19.2%的患者具有“良好”的功能水平,该水平增加至27.5%(P <0.05)。口服奥氮平的数字分别为14.2%和24.5%(P <0.001)。奥氮平-LAI和口服奥氮平之间的结果无显着差异。结论:在这项为期2年的开放性随机研究的olanzapine-LAI中,精神分裂症门诊患者随着时间的推移保持或改善了其良好的基线功能水平。奥氮平-LAI和口服奥氮平之间的结果无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号