首页> 外文期刊>Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences >Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator of 5000?Hz frequency provides better analgesia than that of 100?Hz frequency in mice muscle pain model
【24h】

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator of 5000?Hz frequency provides better analgesia than that of 100?Hz frequency in mice muscle pain model

机译:频率为5000?Hz的经皮电神经刺激器在小鼠肌肉疼痛模型中的镇痛效果优于频率为100?Hz的经皮神经刺激器

获取原文
           

摘要

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulators (TENSs) have been proved to be effective in muscle pain management for several decades. However, there is no consensus for the optimal TENS program. Previous research demonstrated that a 100?Hz TENS (L-TENS) provided better analgesia than a conventional TENS ( 5?Hz). However, no research compared a higher-frequency ( 100?Hz) TENS with a 100?Hz TENS. We used a 5000?Hz (5?kHz) frequency TENS (M-TENS) and an L-TENS to compare analgesic effect on a mice skin/muscle incision retraction model. Three groups of mice were used (sham, L-TENS, and M-TENS) and applied with different TENS programs on Day 4 after the mice skin/muscle incision retraction model; TENS therapy was continued as 20?min/d for 3 days. Mice analgesic effects were measured via Von Frey microfilaments with the up–down method. After therapy, mice spinal cord dorsal horn and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were harvested for cytokine evaluation (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β) with the Western blotting method. Our data demonstrated that the M-TENS produced better analgesia than the L-TENS. Cytokine in the spinal cord or DRG all expressed lower than that of the sham group. However, there is no difference in both cytokine levels between TENSs of different frequencies in the spinal cord and DRG. We concluded that the M-TENS produced faster and better mechanical analgesia than the L-TENS in the mice skin/muscle incision retraction model. Those behavior differences were not in accordance with cytokine changes in the spinal cord or DRG.
机译:数十年来,经皮神经电刺激器(TENS)已被证明可有效治疗肌肉疼痛。但是,关于最佳TENS程序尚无共识。先前的研究表明,与传统的TENS(<5?Hz)相比,100?Hz的TENS(L-TENS)镇痛效果更好。但是,没有研究将较高频率(> 100?Hz)的TENS与100?Hz TENS进行比较。我们使用5000?Hz(5?kHz)频率的TENS(M-TENS)和L-TENS来比较对小鼠皮肤/肌肉切口回缩模型的镇痛作用。使用三组小鼠(假,L-TENS和M-TENS),并在小鼠皮肤/肌肉切口回缩模型后的第4天以不同的TENS程序施用。每天以20?min / d的速度持续进行TENS治疗3天。通过上下法通过冯·弗雷微丝测定小鼠的镇痛作用。治疗后,收集小鼠脊髓背角和背根神经节(DRG),用Western印迹法评估细胞因子(肿瘤坏死因子-α和白介素-1β)。我们的数据表明,M-TENS比L-TENS产生更好的镇痛作用。脊髓或DRG中的细胞因子表达均低于假手术组。但是,脊髓和DRG中不同频率的TENS之间的两种细胞因子水平没有差异。我们得出的结论是,在小鼠皮肤/肌肉切口回缩模型中,M-TENS比L-TENS产生更快,更好的机械镇痛作用。这些行为差异与脊髓或DRG中细胞因子的变化不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号