...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern Pathology >Infiltrative (sinusoidal) and hepatitic patterns of injury in acute cellular rejection in liver allograft with clinical implications
【24h】

Infiltrative (sinusoidal) and hepatitic patterns of injury in acute cellular rejection in liver allograft with clinical implications

机译:肝同种异体移植急性细胞排斥反应中的浸润性(正弦波)和肝损伤模式及其临床意义

获取原文
           

摘要

Acute cellular rejection post liver transplant occurs most commonly but not exclusively in the first year. In this study, we report two patterns: sinusoidal infiltrative and hepatitic, which are not considered in the Banff system. We describe their presentation, response to Solu-Medrol, and compare these to the typical moderate-severe acute cellular rejection. Patients transplanted from 2007 to 2012 at University Health Network, who had biopsy-proven rejection in the first year, were studied. Baseline transaminases and bilirubin, time of acute cellular rejection, follow-up, and treatment responses were analyzed. A total of 407 biopsies were received, of which 77 had diagnosis of acute cellular rejection with rejection activity index 5 or above; 49 from viral hepatitis patients were excluded. Twenty-eight were included; 15/28 (54%) had typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) using Banff criteria. Six (21%) had hepatitic acute cellular rejection overlapping with typical features of acute cellular rejection; seven (25%) had infiltrative acute cellular rejection (iACR) overlapping with typical features. The iACR occurred later than the tACR (124 versus 50 days; P=0.032) and had a higher rise in baseline aspartate aminotransferase (螖AST) compared with tACR (289鈥塙/l versus 109鈥塙/l; P=0.046). Only one out of seven patients with iACR (14 versus 40% in tACR) failed Solu-Medrol boluses and required thymoglobulin. Patients with hepatitic acute cellular rejection (hACR) had similar 螖AST (P=0.12) but higher bilirubinemia than typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) (160鈥?i>渭mol/l versus 35鈥塵ol/l; P=0.039) and required thymoglobulin in four out of six (67% versus 40%) instances. Patients with iACR had higher 螖AST than tACR but better Solu-Medrol response compared with both tACR and hACR. hACR is different from plasma cell-rich late-occurring cellular rejection in its pattern but similar in its poor Solu-Medrol response.
机译:肝移植后急性细胞排斥反应最常见,但并非仅发生在第一年。在这项研究中,我们报告了两种模式:正弦浸润和肝炎,这在班夫系统中并未考虑。我们描述了它们的表现,对Solu-Medrol的反应,并将它们与典型的中度至重度急性细胞排斥反应进行了比较。研究对象是2007年至2012年在大学健康网移植的第一年经活检证实为排斥反应的患者。基线转氨酶和胆红素,急性细胞排斥反应的时间,随访和治疗反应进行了分析。总共接受了407次活检,其中77例诊断为急性细胞排斥,其排斥活性指数为5或更高;排除了病毒性肝炎患者中的49名。其中包括二十八; 15/28(54%)使用班夫标准进行典型的急性细胞排斥反应(tACR)。六个(21%)的肝急性细胞排斥反应与急性细胞排斥反应的典型特征重叠; 7例(25%)的浸润性急性细胞排斥(iACR)与典型特征重叠。 iACR比tACR发生晚(124天vs 50天; P = 0.032),与tACR相比,基线天门冬氨酸转氨酶(螖AST)升高更高(289'/ l对109'/ l; P = 0.046) 。在iACR的七名患者中,只有一名(14名vs tACR的40%)未能通过Solu-Medrol推注并需要胸腺球蛋白。肝急性细胞排斥反应(hACR)的患者具有相似的螖AST(P = 0.12),但胆红素血症比典型的急性细胞排斥反应(tACR)高​​(160μmol/ l与35μsmol/ l; P = 0.039 ),并在六分之三(67%比40%)的情况下需要胸腺球蛋白。与tACR和hACR相比,iACR患者的螖AST比tACR高,但Solu-Medrol反应更好。 hACR的模式不同于富含血浆细胞的晚期发生的细胞排斥反应,但其不良的Solu-Medrol反应相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号