首页> 外文期刊>Microbiology Insights >Limitations of Using Propidium Monoazide with qPCR to Discriminate between Live and Dead Legionella in Biofilm Samples
【24h】

Limitations of Using Propidium Monoazide with qPCR to Discriminate between Live and Dead Legionella in Biofilm Samples

机译:使用单叠氮化丙啶与qPCR区分生物膜样品中的活军团菌和死军团菌的局限性

获取原文
           

摘要

Accurately quantifying Legionella for regulatory purposes to protect public health is essential. Real-time PCR (qPCR) has been proposed as a better method for detecting and enumerating Legionella in samples than conventional culture method. However, since qPCR amplifies any target DNA in the sample, the technique’s inability to discriminate between live and dead cells means that counts are generally significantly overestimated. Propidium monoazide (PMA) has been used successfully in qPCR to aid live/dead discrimination. We tested PMA use as a method to count only live Legionella cells in samples collected from a modified chemostat that generates environmentally comparable samples. Counts from PMA-treated samples that were pretreated with either heat or three types of disinfectants (to kill the cells) were highly variable, with the only consistent trend being the relationship between biofilm mass and numbers of Legionella cells. Two possibilities explain this result: 1. PMA treatment worked and the subsequent muted response of Legionella to disinfection treatment is a factor of biofilm/microbiological effects; although this does not account for the relationship between the amount of biofilm sampled and the viable Legionella count as determined by PMA-qPCR; or 2. PMA treatment did not work, and any measured decrease or increase in detectable Legionella is because of other factors affecting the method. This is the most likely explanation for our results, suggesting that higher concentrations of PMA might be needed to compensate for the presence of other compounds in an environmental sample or that lower amounts of biofilm need to be sampled. As PMA becomes increasingly toxic at higher concentrations and is very expensive, augmenting the method to include higher PMA concentrations is both counterproductive and cost prohibitive. Conversely, if smaller volumes of biofilm are used, the reproducibility of the method is reduced. Our results suggest that using PMA is not an appropriate method for discriminating between live and dead cells to enumerate Legionella for regulatory purposes.
机译:为了监管目的,准确量化军团菌对保护公众健康至关重要。与常规培养方法相比,实时荧光定量PCR(qPCR)被认为是一种更好的检测和枚举军团菌的方法。但是,由于qPCR扩增了样品中的任何靶DNA,因此该技术无法区分活细胞和死细胞,这意味着计数通常被大大高估了。单叠氮化丙锭(PMA)已成功用于qPCR,以帮助区分活/死。我们测试了PMA作为一种方法的用途,该方法仅对从修饰的恒化器收集的样品中的活退伍军人杆菌细胞进行计数,而修饰的恒化器可生成与环境可比的样品。经过加热或三种消毒剂(杀死细胞)预处理的PMA处理样品的计数变化很大,唯一一致的趋势是生物膜质量与军团菌细胞数量之间的关系。有两种可能性可以解释这一结果:1. PMA处理有效,军团菌对消毒处理的无反应是生物膜/微生物作用的一个因素;尽管这不能解释通过PMA-qPCR确定的生物膜采样量与可行军团菌计数之间的关系;或2. PMA治疗无效,可检测到的军团菌减少或增加的任何原因是由于其他因素影响该方法。这是对我们的结果最有可能的解释,表明可能需要较高浓度的PMA来补偿环境样品中其他化合物的存在,或者需要取样较少量的生物膜。由于PMA在较高的浓度下变得越来越有毒且非常昂贵,因此增加该方法以包含较高的PMA浓度既适得其反,也抑制了成本。相反,如果使用较小体积的生物膜,则该方法的可重复性降低。我们的结果表明,使用PMA并不是区分活细胞和死细胞以枚举军团菌以达到调节目的的合适方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号