首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparing the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dual antiplatelet therapy and patients receiving an addition of an anticoagulant after coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
【24h】

Comparing the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dual antiplatelet therapy and patients receiving an addition of an anticoagulant after coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

机译:比较接受双重抗血小板治疗的房颤患者和冠状动脉支架植入术后接受抗凝剂治疗的患者的临床结局:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Data regarding the clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and an anticoagulant in addition to DAPT (DAPT + vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) after coronary stent implantation are still controversial. Therefore, in order to solve this issue, we aim to compare the adverse clinical outcomes in AF patients receiving DAPT and DAPT + VKA after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI-S). Methods: Observational studies comparing the adverse clinical outcomes such as major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis (ST) in AF patients receiving DAPT + VKA therapy, and DAPT after PCI-S have been searched from Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express the pooled effect on discontinuous variables, and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3. Results: Eighteen studies consisting of a total of 20,456 patients with AF (7203 patients received DAPT + VKA and 13,253 patients received DAPT after PCI-S) were included in this meta-analysis. At a mean follow-up period of 15 months, the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in DAPT + VKA group, with OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.50–0.77, P < 0.0001). There was no significant differences in myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular event between DAPT + VKA and DAPT, with OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.92–1.77, P = 0.15) and OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.99–1.39, P = 0.07), respectively. However, the ST, stroke, and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in the DAPT + VKA group, with OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.03–3.81, P = 0.04), 1.59 (95% CI 1.08–2.34, P = 0.02), and 1.41 (95% CI 1.03–1.94, P = 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: At a mean follow-up period of 15 months, DAPT + VKA was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke, ST, and all-cause mortality in AF patients after PCI-S compared with DAPT group. However, the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in the DAPT + VKA group.
机译:背景:关于在冠状动脉支架植入术后接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)和抗凝剂除DAPT(DAPT +维生素K拮抗剂[VKA])之外的房颤(AF)患者临床结局的数据仍存在争议。因此,为了解决该问题,我们旨在比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和支架置入术(PCI-S)后接受DAPT和DAPT + VKA的AF患者的不良临床结局。方法:观察性研究比较了接受DAPT + VKA治疗的AF患者和PCI-S术后DAPT的不良患者的临床不良反应,例如严重出血,严重不良心血管事件,中风,心肌梗塞,全因死亡率和支架血栓形成(ST)已从Medline,EMBASE和PubMed数据库中进行搜索。具有95%置信区间(CI)的几率(OR)用于表达对不连续变量的汇总影响,并且汇总分析使用RevMan 5.3进行。结果:这项荟萃分析包括18项研究,共20,456例AF患者(7203例接受了DAPT + VKA的患者和13,253例接受了PCI-S后的DAPT的患者)。在平均随访期15个月中,DAPT + VKA组的大出血风险显着更高,OR为0.62(95%CI 0.50-0.77,P <0.0001)。 DAPT + VKA和DAPT在心肌梗塞和重大心血管不良事件方面无显着差异,OR为1.27(95%CI 0.92-1.77,P = 0.15)和OR 1.17(95%CI 0.99-1.39,P = 0.07) , 分别。但是,DAPT + VKA组的ST,卒中和全因死亡率显着降低,OR分别为1.98(95%CI 1.03–3.81,P = 0.04),1.59(95%CI 1.08–2.34,P = 0.02)。 )和1.41(95%CI 1.03–1.94,P = 0.03)。结论:与DAPT组相比,PCI-S术后AF患者的平均随访时间为15个月,DAPT + VKA与卒中,ST和全因死亡率显着降低有关。但是,DAPT + VKA组的大出血风险明显更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号