首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Environmental Science >Expert based ecosystem service assessment in coastal and marine planning and management: a Baltic lagoon case study
【24h】

Expert based ecosystem service assessment in coastal and marine planning and management: a Baltic lagoon case study

机译:沿海和海洋规划与管理中基于专家的生态系统服务评估:波罗的海泻湖案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The assessment of ecosystem services, the benefits humans obtain from ecosystems, is a worldwide topic of growing interest, but examples addressing coastal and marine water are still a small minority. In this study, we carry out an expert based ecosystem service assessment for a concrete case study, the Szczecin (Oder) Lagoon located at the German/Polish border in the Baltic Sea region. We analyze to what extent, in which step and how it can be applied for supporting Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM), the ecological-social-economic assessment within System Approach Frameworks (SAF) and Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). The large, shallow Szczecin Lagoon is heavily eutrophied. Therefore, several alternative measures (scenarios) are under discussion to improve its water quality and its ecological status. Scenarios include a large-scale mussel farm; the establishment of a local mussel farm that removes nutrients via harvest and increases water transparency; artificial mussel beds; groynes to reduce coastal current velocities, favor sediment accumulation, and promote the enlargement of macrophyte beds and other measures to enlarge macrophyte belts and coverage. We adapt and apply a computer aided ecosystem service assessment and visualization tool (ESAT). Eight experts and two student groups apply this tool and carry out an assessment of each scenario compared to the present state of the lagoon. The results show that the scenario assuming measures to enlarge macrophyte belts is perceived as the one that generates the highest additional ecosystem service output. However, more importantly our approach can serve as tool to catch the views of experts, can extract disagreements between experts and misunderstandings in the setup of scenarios as well as services that have highest priority for further consideration. Further, the results are useful for preparing stakeholder discussions and workshops. However, the expert assessments are influenced by the spatial scale of the assessed scenarios. As consequence, the assessment results itself cannot be regarded as a reliable basis for decision making. Today, Integrated Coastal Zone Management ideas and approaches are well reflected and integrated into Marine Spatial Planning and we show that a comparative ecosystem service assessment can be applied in different steps of each concept.
机译:对生态系统服务(人类从生态系统中获得的收益)的评估是一个日益引起人们关注的全球性话题,但是涉及沿海和海洋水的例子仍然很少。在这项研究中,我们针对一个具体的案例进行了基于专家的生态系统服务评估,该案例位于波罗的海地区德国/波兰边界的什切青(奥得河)泻湖。我们分析了在多大程度上,在哪一步以及如何将其用于支持综合海岸带管理(ICZM),系统方法框架(SAF)和海洋空间规划(MSP)内的生态-社会-经济评估。大而浅的什切青泻湖富营养化。因此,正在讨论几种替代措施(方案)以改善其水质和生态状况。场景包括大型贻贝养殖场;建立当地的贻贝养殖场,通过收获去除营养并增加水的透明度;人工贻贝床;防波堤可降低沿海水流速度,有利于沉积物积聚,并促进大型植物床的扩大以及其他扩大大型植物带和覆盖范围的措施。我们改编并应用计算机辅助的生态系统服务评估和可视化工具(ESAT)。八个专家和两个学生小组使用此工具,并与泻湖的当前状态进行了比较,对每种情况进行了评估。结果表明,采取措施扩大大型植物带的设想方案被认为是产生最高附加生态系统服务产出的方案。但是,更重要的是,我们的方法可以用作吸引专家意见的工具,可以在设置场景和服务时将专家之间的分歧和误解引起,以供进一步考虑。此外,结果对于准备利益相关者的讨论和研讨会很有用。但是,专家评估受评估方案的空间规模的影响。结果,评估结果本身不能被视为决策的可靠依据。今天,沿海地区综合管理的思想和方法已得到很好的体现,并已融入海洋空间规划中,并且我们表明,可将比较性的生态系统服务评估应用于每个概念的不同步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号