首页> 外文期刊>Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy >Innovation Perspectives in Local Administration at the Beginning of the “Age of Cities”
【24h】

Innovation Perspectives in Local Administration at the Beginning of the “Age of Cities”

机译:“城市时代”开始之初的地方行政创新视角

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper represents an insight of the public administration process to adapt to innovation. The particularities consist in the fact that, at least in Romania and other CEE countries, this process is rooted not only in the objective reality, but also this process has to include the adaptation of the (centralized) “state” to the market conditions. Somehow, it may be a contradiction between state/central/local administration and the market. Traditionally (or conservatively), the public administration is known as an exponent of the state, a state that must address equally, equitably and objectively the whole community and to ensure the right conditions for its correct functioning. The latter concept – market – is the opposite of the state, it implies competition, preferences, some kind of democratic (as opposite to central) participation at the city life. The nowadays realities put public and private face to face, forcing them to find a way to co-exist and co-create for the benefit of the whole community. The two sectors have all the conditions to collaborate, considering the scale of the flows, including the flows of innovation and knowledge that characterize our society today. The research is focused on the ”status” of innovation in Romania, in general, and in public administration, in particular. In spite of its evolution from the centralized state to the EU democratic state, the innovation in public administration is perceived more as a restructuration or reorganization process required by the European Union. The underestimate of the innovation in the public administration is explained by the generally reduced interest paid to innovation both in the private as well as public sector, as revealed by the secondary data analyze we conducted within the documentation for this paper. The in-depth interviews are trying to explain how the local administration practically works, considering the innovation process. The results should be understood and further discussed from the larger perspective of new development trends, models and performance of cities all worldwide.
机译:本文代表了对公共管理过程适应创新的见解。特殊之处在于,至少在罗马尼亚和其他中欧和东欧国家,这一过程不仅植根于客观现实,而且这一过程还必须包括(集中的)“国家”适应市场条件。不知何故,这可能是州/中央/地方政府与市场之间的矛盾。传统上(或保守地),公共行政被称为国家的指数,该州必须平等,公平和客观地处理整个社区,并确保其正常运行的正确条件。市场这个概念与国家相反,它意味着竞争,偏好,某种民主(与中央相对)的参与城市生活。当今的现实使公共和私人面对面,迫使他们寻找一种共存和共创的方式,以造福整个社区。考虑到流动的规模,包括创新和知识的流动,这两个部门具有合作的所有条件,这是当今社会的特征。研究主要集中在罗马尼亚,特别是公共行政部门的创新“状态”上。尽管从中央集权国家演变为欧盟民主国家,但公共行政创新仍被视为欧盟要求的重组或重组过程。我们在本文的文档中进行的次要数据分析显示,公共管理部门创新的低估是由于私营部门和公共部门对创新支付的利息普遍减少所致。考虑到创新过程,深入访​​谈试图解释当地行政部门的实际运作方式。应该从全球新发展趋势,模型和性能的更大角度来理解和进一步讨论结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号