...
首页> 外文期刊>Majallah-i pizishki-i Urumiyah. >ENAMEL SURFACE ROUGHNESS FOLLOWING ORTHODONTIC BRACKET DEBONDING AND COMPOSITE RESIN REMOVAL USING TUNGSTEN CARBIDE AND ARKANSAS BURS
【24h】

ENAMEL SURFACE ROUGHNESS FOLLOWING ORTHODONTIC BRACKET DEBONDING AND COMPOSITE RESIN REMOVAL USING TUNGSTEN CARBIDE AND ARKANSAS BURS

机译:正畸支架脱胶并用碳化钨和奥肯色毛刺去除树脂后的搪瓷表面粗糙度

获取原文
           

摘要

Background &?Aims : Scratching the enamel surface during orthodontic bracket debonding and removal of adhesive remnants is a common concern for orthodontists. This study sought to assess the enamel surface roughness following the use of low speed tungsten carbide (TCB) and high-speed Arkansas burs (AB). Materials & Methods : This in-vitro experimental study was performed on 72 first and second premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes. Labial surfaces of the teeth were etched and brackets were bonded using light-cure composite resin. After 24 hours, orthodontic brackets were debonded by holding them from the mesial and distal and peeling the bracket base away from the tooth using a debonding fine cutter in order to minimize the trauma to the enamel. The teeth were then randomly divided into two groups of 36. The composite remnants were removed using a 12-blade TCB and low speed hand piece in group 1 and AB and high-speed hand piece in group 2. The enamel surface roughness of specimens was evaluated under a stereomicroscope using the surface roughness index described by Howell and Weeks. The time required for complete adhesive removal from the enamel surface was recorded in seconds. The data were analyzed using non-parametric chi square test. Results : In both TCB and AB groups, the enamel surface roughness significantly increased compared to the baseline value (P=0.001 for TCB and P=0.004 for AB). No significant difference was found in surface roughness between the two groups after the intervention (P=0.431). The time spent for complete removal of remnants was significantly shorter with AB compared to TCB (P=0.00). Conclusion : Considering the same level of surface roughness caused by AB and TCB and faster removal AB, AB is recommended for composite remnant removal. However, further studies are required in this respect.
机译:背景与目的:在正畸托槽剥离和刮除粘附残余物的过程中刮擦牙釉质表面是正畸医生普遍关注的问题。这项研究试图评估使用低速碳化钨(TCB)和高速阿肯色车针(AB)后的搪瓷表面粗糙度。材料与方法:这项体外实验研究是在为正畸目的提取的72颗第一和第二颗前磨牙上进行的。蚀刻牙齿的唇面,并使用光固化复合树脂粘结托槽。 24小时后,将正畸托槽从内侧和远端固定下来,然后用细切小骨刀将托槽基部从牙齿上剥下,从而将其剥离,以最大程度地减少对牙釉质的伤害。然后将牙齿随机分为两组,每组36个。在第1组中使用12刀片TCB和低速机头,在第2组中使用AB和高速机头去除复合残余物。在立体显微镜下使用Howell和Weeks描述的表面粗糙度指数进行评估。以秒为单位记录从搪瓷表面完全除去粘合剂所需的时间。使用非参数卡方检验分析数据。结果:TCB和AB组的牙釉质表面粗糙度均比基线值显着增加(TCB的P = 0.001,AB的P = 0.004)。干预后两组之间的表面粗糙度没有显着差异(P = 0.431)。与TCB相比,AB完全清除残留物所花费的时间明显较短(P = 0.00)。结论:考虑到由AB和TCB引起的表面粗糙度水平相同,且AB去除速度更快,建议使用AB去除复合材料残留物。但是,这方面需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号