首页> 外文期刊>Majallah-i pizishki-i Urumiyah. >Students' Attitudes toward Grammar Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Courses in Urmia University of Medical Sciences (UMSU)
【24h】

Students' Attitudes toward Grammar Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Courses in Urmia University of Medical Sciences (UMSU)

机译:乌尔米亚医科大学(UMSU)学生​​对英语专用语法(ESP)课程的语法翻译方法(GTM)和交际语言教学(CLT)的态度

获取原文
           

摘要

Background & Aims : Methodology as a critical factor plays a significant role in achieving the acceptable results in educational fields, particularly in the process of language teaching and learning in applied linguistics. Analyzing the teaching methodology from different perspectives such as satisfaction is also important. Accordingly, the purpose of present paper is to evaluate the satisfaction level the students of medicine about GTM and CLT methods in UMSU. Materials & Methods: To this end, a designed questionnaire was used among 35 students of medicine (17 males and 18 females) as a convenience sample ranging from 19 to 22 years to assess their beliefs about GTM and CLT. The quantitative and descriptive statistical methods were used to evaluate the students’ satisfactions level toward GTM and CLT. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 17. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was applied to evaluate the normal distribution of data in different variables (p 0.05). In order to compare the mean scores of two methods, a paired t-test was used, respectively. Results: The findings indicated that there is a significant difference in students’ perception between GTM and CLT method in the presentation of contents. Students had positive attitudes toward deductive and lectured-based learning, and they were satisfied with GTM. In other four remained options, no significant differences were observed. Conclusion: According to the results, it was revealed that although CLT method is confirmed and suggested by a large number of scholars to be an effective method in language teaching, its state of the practice is not in favor of learners in some cases, mainly among the students of medicine at UMSU.
机译:背景与目的:方法论是至关重要的因素,在获得教育领域的可接受结果方面,尤其是在应用语言学的语言教学过程中,扮演着重要的角色。从诸如满意度之类的不同角度分析教学方法也很重要。因此,本文旨在评估医学生对UMSU中GTM和CLT方法的满意度。资料和方法:为此,在35名医学专业学生(17名男性和18名女性)中使用了设计问卷,作为19至22岁的方便样本,以评估他们对GTM和CLT的信念。定量和描述性统计方法用于评估学生对GTM和CLT的满意度。使用SPSS软件(版本17)分析收集的数据。使用Kolmogorov-Smirnov(K-S)测试来评估数据在不同变量中的正态分布(p> 0.05)。为了比较两种方法的平均得分,分别使用了配对t检验。结果:调查结果表明,在内容呈现方面,GTM和CLT方法在学生的感知方面存在显着差异。学生对演绎和基于讲授的学习持积极态度,他们对GTM感到满意。在其他四个备选方案中,未观察到显着差异。结论:根据研究结果表明,尽管CLT方法已被众多学者确认并提出是一种有效的语言教学方法,但在某些情况下,它的实践状态不利于学习者,主要是UMSU的医学生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号