首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Research >Efficacy of Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Management of Suspected Small Bowel Bleeding in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
【24h】

Efficacy of Video Capsule Endoscopy in the Management of Suspected Small Bowel Bleeding in Patients With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

机译:视频胶囊内窥镜检查在连续流左心室辅助装置患者疑似小肠出血的处理中的功效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients have a high prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeding from the small bowel. Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is often used for diagnosis in these patients, but efficacy has yet to be determined. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of VCE in the management of CF-LVAD patients with suspected small bowel bleeding by comparing to a non-VCE CF-LVAD control group.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with CF-LVADs implanted at Stanford Hospital from January 2010 to October 2015. Patients were included in the study if there was a clinical suspicion of small bowel bleeding and either a negative upper endoscopy or colonoscopy.Results: A total of 26 patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 15 encounters where VCE was done, and 25 where VCE was not done. There were no statistical differences when comparing these groups in terms of medical therapy use (thalidomide or octreotide), enteroscopy use (double-balloon or push), intervention on lesions, or any 30-day outcomes. There was no advantage to VCE with regard to the composite endpoint time to re-bleed or death related to re-bleeding (median 114 vs. 161 days, P = 0.15) after removing patients who did not get a VCE due to death or critical illness.Conclusions: We did not find VCE changed management or outcomes in CF-LVAD patients with suspected small bowel bleeding at our institution when compared to a non-VCE control group. Our experience is small and single center, and larger, multi-center studies could further elucidate the utility of VCE in this patient population.Gastroenterol Res. 2017;10(5):280-287doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/gr908w
机译:背景:连续流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)患者从小肠消化道出血的患病率很高。视频胶囊内窥镜检查(VCE)通常用于这些患者的诊断,但疗效尚待确定。在这项研究中,我们通过与非VCE CF-LVAD对照组进行比较,评估了VCE在CF-LVAD怀疑有小肠出血的处理中的有效性。方法:我们回顾性回顾了所有CF-LVAD患者的图表于2010年1月至2015年10月在斯坦福医院植入。临床怀疑小肠出血且上内镜检查或结肠镜检查为阴性的患者被纳入研究。结果:总共26例患者符合入选标准完成VCE时遇到15次,未完成VCE时遇到25次。比较这些组在药物治疗(沙利度胺或奥曲肽),肠镜检查(双气囊或推挤),病变干预或任何30天结局方面无统计学差异。移除因死亡或危重而未获得VCE的患者后,VCE在复合终点再出血时间或与再次出血相关的死亡方面无优势(中位数114比161天,P = 0.15)。结论:与非VCE对照组相比,在我们机构中,CF-LVAD怀疑有小肠大出血的患者未发现VCE改变管理或结局。我们的经验是小型和单中心的,而大型多中心的研究可以进一步阐明VCE在该患者人群中的作用。 2017; 10(5):280-287doi:https://doi.org/10.14740/gr908w

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号