首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Microbiology >Controlling the Microbiome: Microhabitat Adjustments for Successful Biocontrol Strategies in Soil and Human Gut
【24h】

Controlling the Microbiome: Microhabitat Adjustments for Successful Biocontrol Strategies in Soil and Human Gut

机译:控制微生物组:土壤和人类肠道中成功的生物防治策略的微生境调整。

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction The human gut and the rhizosphere are environments colonized by highly diverse communities of microbes, which perform complex interactions with their host and carry out important functions including enhanced disease resistance and nutrient uptake. In humans they are involved in energy harvest and storage as well as in interactions with the immune system (Clemente et al., 2012 ). In plants they have profound effects on seed germination, seedling vigor, nutrition, plant health, and development of the innate immune system (Mendes et al., 2013 ; Berg et al., 2014a ; Schikora et al., 2016 ). The composition of the microbial communities is host-specific and related to its health status (Smalla et al., 2001 ; Kinross et al., 2011 ; Berg et al., 2014a ). Imbalances caused by disturbance-induced shifts in microbial species abundances can lead to disease outbreaks in both environments (Berendsen et al., 2012 ; Robles Alonso and Guarner, 2013 ; Berg et al., 2014b ) and further to probable proliferation of pathogenic species (Van Elsas et al., 2012 ; Van Agtmaal et al., 2015 ).To restore or maintain the health of the host, bio-based solutions supporting the pathogen-suppressing ability of the hosts' native microbiome can be applied, including probiotics, synbiotics and biocontrol agents (de Vrese and Schrezenmeir, 2008 ). Such methods aim to increase the abundance and activity of host beneficial bacteria (HBB). However, addition of HBB does not always result in the desired pathogen suppression due to insufficient establishment, i.e., lower survival and/or poor colonization rates of the HBB (Bashan et al., 2014 ).Concepts from invasion ecology suggest that survival rates of invaders are inversely related to the diversity of the native microbiome. This can be explained by higher resource uptake and consequent reduction in niche availability (Mallon et al., 2015 ). In addition, prevailing physical and chemical parameters in the respective environment like texture, pore size distribution, and moisture content might not favor the establishment of the introduced HBB. For a long-term establishment of the HBB in the soil these abiotic factors have to be considered. In the gut, the colonization resistance determined by the commensal microbiome is linked to its capacity to exploit the available niches and to prevent the establishment of invaders via niche occupation (reviewed in Stecher et al., 2013 ). The knowledge on mechanisms of microbial invasions (Mallon et al., 2015 ) can be used to improve the survival of HBB in both environments.Given that similar mechanisms drive microbial colonization and establishment in the gut and rhizosphere microbiomes, we suggest that biocontrol strategies could be similar for both environments (Ramírez-Puebla et al., 2013 ; Berg et al., 2015 ; Mendes and Raaijmakers, 2015 ). Here we develop possible strategies to ensure long-term establishment of HBB by manipulating niche availability. Creating microhabitats for host beneficial bacteria by introducing minor disturbances Several studies have shown that soils harboring low microbial biomass or low microbial diversity are more susceptible to colonization by other organisms (Flie?bach et al., 2009 ; Van Elsas et al., 2012 ). Certain agricultural practices can result in major disturbances of the rhizosphere microbiome . Examples include disinfestation with chemical pesticides, heat treatment (Stapleton, 2000 ), radiation or anaerobic disinfestation (Van Agtmaal et al., 2015 ). Moreover, tillage systems may have major effects on the established community by reducing certain soil microbial populations, particularly fungi (Ventorino et al., 2012 ). Analogous events, leading to changes in the human gut microbiome , are the application of broad spectrum antibiotics, fecal transplantations (Landy et al., 2011 ; de Vos, 2013 ) or considerable changes in diet (Turnbaugh et al., 2009 ). Whilst major disturbances are frequently used to eliminate pathogens, those methods possibly also disrupt beneficial functions of the indigenous microbial community (Altieri, 1999 ; Geiger et al., 2010 ).An alternative strategy is to introduce minor disturbances to create free niches for HBB's in both the rhizosphere and the human gut microbiome. This strategy aims to selectively empty niches in the existing community.In the rhizosphere the introduction of accessory bacterial predators such as protozoa (e.g., flagellates, ciliates) or nematodes (Jousset et al., 2006 ; Abada et al., 2009 ; Pedersen et al., 2009 ; Freyth et al., 2010 ; Neidig et al., 2011 ; Müller et al., 2013 ) could foster biocontrol strains via enhanced selective predation when the biocontrol strain protects itself through production of antibiotics. The increase in predation pressure might also stimulate biocontrol strategies by direct predation on pathogens as well as nutrient turnover and bacterial activity in soil. Likewise, specific bacteriophages could be applied to selectively eliminate t
机译:简介人类的肠道和根际是被高度多样化的微生物群落所占据的环境,它们与宿主进行复杂的相互作用,并发挥重要的功能,包括增强抗病性和营养吸收。在人类中,它们参与能量的收集和储存以及与免疫系统的相互作用(Clemente等,2012)。在植物中,它们对种子发芽,幼苗活力,营养,植物健康以及先天免疫系统的发育具有深远的影响(Mendes等,2013; Berg等,2014a; Schikora等,2016)。微生物群落的组成是宿主特异性的,并且与其健康状况有关(Smalla等,2001; Kinross等,2011; Berg等,2014a)。由干扰引起的微生物物种丰度变化引起的失衡可能导致两种环境下的疾病暴发(Berendsen等,2012; Robles Alonso和Guarner,2013; Berg等,2014b),并进一步导致病原体的扩散(Berendsen等,2012)。 Van Elsas等人,2012; Van Agtmaal等人,2015)。为恢复或保持宿主的健康,可以使用支持宿主天然微生物组抑制病原体能力的生物基溶液,包括益生菌,合生元和生物防治剂(de Vrese和Schrezenmeir,2008年)。此类方法旨在增加宿主有益细菌(HBB)的丰度和活性。然而,由于建立不足,即添加的HBB并不总是导致所需的病原体抑制,即HBB的存活率较低和/或定植率低(Bashan等人,2014)。入侵生态学的概念表明,HBB的存活率入侵者与天然微生物组的多样性成反比。这可以用更高的资源吸收率和随之而来的小生境可利用性降低来解释(Mallon等,2015)。此外,各个环境中的主要物理和化学参数(例如质地,孔径分布和水分含量)可能不利于引入HBB的建立。为了在土壤中长期建立六溴代二苯,必须考虑这些非生物因素。在肠道中,由共生微生物组确定的定植抗性与其利用可利用的生态位并通过利基占领防止入侵者建立的能力有关(Stecher et al。,2013综述)。关于微生物入侵的机制的知识(Mallon et al。,2015)可用于提高HBB在两种环境中的存活率。鉴于类似的机制可驱动肠道和根际微生物群落中的微生物定植和建立,我们建议采取生物防治策略可以两种环境都相似(Ramírez-Puebla等,2013; Berg等,2015; Mendes和Raaijmakers,2015)。在这里,我们开发可行的策略,通过操纵利基市场的可用性来确保HBB的长期建立。通过引入较小的干扰为宿主有益细菌创造微生境一些研究表明,微生物量低或微生物多样性低的土壤更容易被其他生物定殖(Flie?bach等,2009; Van Elsas等,2012)。 。某些农业实践可能导致根际微生物组发生重大干扰。例子包括化学农药的灭虫,热处理(Stapleton,2000),辐射或厌氧的灭虫(Van Agtmaal等人,2015)。此外,耕作制度可能会通过减少某些土壤微生物种群,特别是真菌,对已建立的社区产生重大影响(Ventorino等,2012)。导致人类肠道微生物组发生变化的类似事件是广谱抗生素的应用,粪便移植(Landy等,2011; de Vos,2013)或饮食的显着变化(Turnbaugh等,2009)。虽然经常使用重大干扰来消除病原体,但这些方法也可能破坏本地微生物群落的有益功能(Altieri,1999; Geiger等,2010)。另一种策略是引入较小干扰,为HBBs创造自由生态位。根际和人类肠道微生物组。该策略旨在有选择地清空现有群落中的生态位。在根际中,引入了辅助细菌捕食者,例如原生动物(例如鞭毛,纤毛)或线虫(Jousset等,2006; Abada等,2009; Pedersen等)。等人,2009; Freyth等人,2010; Neidig等人,2011;Müller等人,2013)可以通过增强选择性捕食来培育生物防治菌株,前提是该生物防治菌株通过生产抗生素来保护自身。捕食压力的增加也可能通过直接捕食病原体以及土壤中的养分转化和细菌活性而刺激生物防治策略。同样,可以应用特定的噬菌体来选择性消除细菌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号