...
首页> 外文期刊>Great Plains Research >Book Review: The Politics of Official Apologies By Melissa Nobles
【24h】

Book Review: The Politics of Official Apologies By Melissa Nobles

机译:书评:正式道歉的政治,梅利莎·诺布尔斯(Melissa Nobles)

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent years there has been an active dialogue on whether historic injustice has relevance in contemporary societies and, if so, whether an official “apology” accomplishes any beneficial purpose. Many scholars working on the topic of reparations have argued that an apology is largely irrelevant as a mere “symbolic act” unless accompanied by some material recognition of rights or transfer of resources that demonstrates a commitment to “repair” the injustice. This book, however, posits that the apology itself has value. Nobles proposes a “membership theory of apologies” that focuses on the ideological and moral value of apology rather than anticipated material gains. Within this view, apologies are not mere “symbolic gestures,” like monuments, but instead “publicly ratify certain reinterpretations of history” and also “morally judge, assign responsibility and introduce expectations about what acknowledgment of that history requires.” In this sense, although apologies focus our attention on the “past,” they also have implications for the “future.”Nobles examines the role of official apologies as a mode of altering conceptions of national membership for minority groups within pluralistic democracies. She posits that “apologies are desired, offered, and given in order to change the terms and meanings of membership in a political community,” arguing that membership in democratic societies entails a shared sense of rights, obligations, and responsibilities manifested between and among citizens and their government. Claims may arise when the government fails to meet the “expectations” of its citizens. For groups that have suffered a history of injustice, however, “grievances” are just as likely to relate to the historical injustice as they are to the contemporary perception of group members that they are at a disadvantage in contemporary society. Thus, the harm may be one that cannot be remedied merely by passing a law or by implementing a new policy. Apologies are desirable in such circumstances because they “bring history into the conversation, providing justification for political and policy changes and reforms.”
机译:近年来,关于历史上的不公正在当代社会中是否具有现实意义,以及如果这样的话,官方的“道歉”是否实现了任何有益的目的,一直存在着积极的对话。许多从事赔偿问题的学者认为,道歉与仅仅作为“象征性行为”无关,除非伴随着对权利或资源转让的某种物质承认,表明对“不公正”进行“修复”。然而,这本书认为道歉本身具有价值。 Nobles提出了一种“道歉成员理论”,其重点是道歉的思想和道德价值,而不是预期的物质利益。在这种观点下,道歉不只是像纪念碑那样的“象征性手势”,而是“公开批准对历史的某些重新诠释”,还“在道义上判断,分配责任并对期望承认的历史提出期望”。从这个意义上讲,虽然道歉将我们的注意力集中在“过去”上,但它们也对“未来”产生了影响。贵族考察了官方道歉的作用,作为改变多元民主国家中少数群体的国家成员资格的一种方式。她认为,“为了改变政治共同体成员的条款和含义而希望,提供和给予道歉”,认为民主社会的成员必须在公民之间和公民之间体现出共同的权利,义务和责任感。和他们的政府。当政府未能满足其公民的“期望”时,可能会提出索赔。但是,对于经历过不公正历史的群体,“不满”与历史不公正的可能性一样大,与他们对当代群体成员在当代社会中处于不利地位的当代看法一样。因此,损害可能是仅通过通过法律或实施新政策无法补救的损害。在这种情况下道歉是可取的,因为道歉“将历史带入对话,为政治和政策的变化与改革提供理由”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号