首页> 外文期刊>Great Plains Research >Review of "Points in Time: Structure and Event in a Late Northern Plains Hunting Society" by Philip Duke
【24h】

Review of "Points in Time: Structure and Event in a Late Northern Plains Hunting Society" by Philip Duke

机译:菲利普·杜克(Philip Duke)评述“时间点:北部平原狩猎社会的结构和事件”

获取原文
       

摘要

The first processual studies in archaeology began appearing-and making an impression on the field as a whole-nearly 30 years ago. These studies ushered in a revolution in American archaeology and forever changed how this field is taught and practiced. A great deal of heat was exchanged between the processualists and the traditionists as the new paradigm slowly was accepted into mainstream archaeology. Much of this heat was unfortunately expended uselessly as people spoke past one another both in person and in print. The processual school eventually won the struggle, and such studies today are themselves traditional. Efforts by a new group-the postprocessualists-now are being made to recast the goals of archaeology. These efforts are making headway very slowly, largely, I think, because of the obscure language in which they are broached.
机译:考古学的第一个过程研究开始出现,并且在整个30年前就给整个领域留下了深刻的印象。这些研究引发了美国考古学的一场革命,并永远改变了这一领域的教学和实践方式。随着新范式逐渐被主流考古学所接受,过程主义者与传统主义者之间进行了大量的热交换。不幸的是,当人们亲身或书面交谈时,大部分热量都浪费了。程序学校最终赢得了斗争,今天的这类研究本身就是传统的。一个新的团体-后加工主义者-现在正在努力重塑考古学的目标。我认为,这些努力进展缓慢,主要是因为他们讲的语言晦涩难懂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号