...
首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Computer-Aided Surgery Does Not Increase the Accuracy of Dorsal Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 2,003 Pedicle Screws in a Level I Trauma Center
【24h】

Computer-Aided Surgery Does Not Increase the Accuracy of Dorsal Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 2,003 Pedicle Screws in a Level I Trauma Center

机译:计算机辅助外科手术不会增加胸椎和腰椎中背椎弓根螺钉的放置精度:对I级创伤中心中2,003根椎弓根螺钉的回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design A retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Objective Meta-analyses suggest that computer-assisted systems can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for dorsal spinal fusion procedures. The results of further meta-analyses report that in the thoracic spine, both the methods have comparable placement accuracy. These studies are limited due to an abundance of screw classification systems. The aim of this study was to assess the placement accuracy and potentially influencing factors of three-dimensionally navigated versus conventionally inserted pedicle screws. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database at a level I trauma center of pedicle screw placement (computer-navigated versus traditionally placed) for dorsal spinal stabilizations. The cases spanned a 5.5-year study period (January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010). The perforations of the pedicle were differentiated in three grades based on the postoperative computed tomography. Results The overall placement accuracy was 86% in the conventional group versus 79% in the computer-navigated group (grade 0). The computer-navigated procedures were superior in the lumbar spine and the conventional procedures were superior in the thoracic spine, but both failed to be of statistical significance. The level of experience of the performing surgeon and the patient's body mass index did not influence the placement accuracy. The only significant influence was the spinal segment: the higher the spinal level where the fusion was performed, the more likely the screw was displaced. Conclusions The computer-navigated and conventional methods are both safe procedures to place transpedicular screws at the traumatized thoracic and lumbar spine. At the moment, three-dimensionally based navigation does not significantly increase the placement accuracy. Keywords: computer assisted pedicle screw placement, computer navigation, spine, pedicle screw, image based guidance
机译:研究设计对前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。客观的荟萃分析表明,计算机辅助系统可以提高椎弓根螺钉在背侧脊柱融合手术中的位置准确性。进一步的荟萃分析结果表明,在胸椎中,两种方法的置入准确性均相当。这些研究由于螺丝分类系统的丰富而受到限制。这项研究的目的是评估三维导航与传统插入的椎弓根螺钉的放置精度和可能的影响因素。方法这是前瞻性数据库在I级椎弓根螺钉放置(计算机导航与传统放置)创伤中心的背侧脊柱稳定手术的回顾性分析。这些案例涵盖了5.5年的研究期(2005年1月1日至2010年6月30日)。根据术后计算机体层摄影术,将椎弓根的穿孔分为三个等级。结果常规组的总体放置准确度为86%,而计算机导航组(0级)为79%。在腰椎中,计算机导航程序优越,而在胸椎中,传统程序优越,但两者均无统计学意义。执行医师的经验水平和患者的体重指数不会影响放置的准确性。唯一重要的影响是脊柱节段:进行融合的脊柱水平越高,螺钉移位的可能性就越大。结论计算机导航和常规方法都是将椎弓根螺钉放置在受创伤的胸椎和腰椎上的安全方法。目前,基于三维的导航不会显着提高放置精度。关键字:计算机辅助椎弓根螺钉放置,计算机导航,脊柱,椎弓根螺钉,基于图像的指导

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号