...
首页> 外文期刊>German Medical Science >Interventions for reducing self-stigma in people with mental illnesses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Interventions for reducing self-stigma in people with mental illnesses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

机译:减少精神疾病患者自尊的干预措施:对随机对照试验的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Self-stigma occurs when people with mental illnesses internalize negative stereotypes and prejudices about their condition. It can reduce help-seeking behaviour and treatment adherence. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing self-stigma in people with mental illness is systematically reviewed. Results are discussed in the context of a logic model of the broader social context of mental illness stigma. Methods: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, and CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials in November 2013. Studies were assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Results: Five trials were eligible for inclusion, four of which provided data for statistical analyses. Four studies had a high risk of bias. The quality of evidence was very low for each set of interventions and outcomes. The interventions studied included various group based anti-stigma interventions and an anti-stigma booklet. The intensity and fidelity of most interventions was high. Two studies were considered to be sufficiently homogeneous to be pooled for the outcome self-stigma. The meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant effect (SMD [95% CI] at 3 months: –0.26 [–0.64, 0.12], I2=0%, n=108). None of the individual studies found sustainable effects on other outcomes, including recovery, help-seeking behaviour and self-stigma.Conclusions: The effectiveness of interventions against self-stigma is uncertain. Previous studies lacked statistical power, used questionable outcome measures and had a high risk of bias. Future studies should be based on robust methods and consider practical implications regarding intervention development (relevance, implementability, and placement in routine services).
机译:背景:当精神疾病患者内化负面刻板印象和对自己状况的偏见时,就会出现自我污名。它可以减少寻求帮助的行为和治疗依从性。系统地审查了旨在减少精神疾病患者自尊的干预措施的有效性。在更广泛的精神病耻辱社会背景的逻辑模型的背景下讨论了结果。方法:2013年11月,对Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,ERIC和CENTRAL进行了随机对照试验。以Cochrane偏倚风险工具对研究进行了评估。结果:五项试验符合纳入条件,其中四项提供了统计分析数据。四项研究有偏见的高风险。每组干预措施和结果的证据质量都非常低。研究的干预措施包括各种基于群体的反污名干预措施和一本反污名小册子。大多数干预措施的强度和保真度很高。两项研究被认为具有足够的同质性,可以归纳为结果的自我烙印。荟萃分析未发现统计学上的显着影响(3个月时SMD [95%CI]:–0.26 [–0.64,0.12],I 2 = 0%,n = 108)。个别研究均未发现对其他结局具有可持续影响,包括恢复,寻求帮助行为和自尊。结论:对抗自尊的干预措施的有效性尚不确定。先前的研究缺乏统计能力,使用可疑的结局指标,并且偏见风险很高。未来的研究应基于可靠的方法,并考虑有关干预措施开发的实际意义(相关性,可实施性和在常规服务中的位置)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号