首页> 外文期刊>Geographica helvetica >Fuelwood territorialities: iChantier d'Aménagement Forestier/i and the reproduction of “political forests” in Burkina Faso
【24h】

Fuelwood territorialities: iChantier d'Aménagement Forestier/i and the reproduction of “political forests” in Burkina Faso

机译:薪材领域:香奈儿·德·阿曼纳奇森林人和布基纳法索的“政治森林”繁殖

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper investigates the endurance of a national forest management programme in Burkina Faso called Chantier d'Aménagement Forestier (CAF), which focuses on the participatory sustainable production of fuelwood and is widely supported by international donors despite evidence of its shortcomings. We analyse the surprising persistence of the CAF model as a case of the territorialisation of state power through the reproduction of “political forests” – drawing on the work of Peluso and Vandergeest (2001, 2011). Analysing some the shortcomings and incoherencies of the model, we bring to light the role of non-state actors in the reproduction of the CAF as a “political forest”. We show that informal regulatory arrangements have emerged between state and non-state actors, namely merchants and customary authorities, over the production of fuelwood. We call these arrangements “fuelwood territorialities” because they have contributed to keeping the CAF's resource model unquestioned. With fuelwood territorialities, we draw attention to the role of non-state actors in the reproduction of “political forests”, that is, the process of state territorialisation through forest governance. This analysis helps clarify how certain areas, such as the CAFs, keep being officially represented as “forest” even though they are dominated by a patchwork of fields, fallows, and savannahs and do not have the ecological characteristics of one.
机译:本文研究了布基纳法索国家森林管理计划(Chantier d'AménagementForestier(CAF))的耐久性,该计划侧重于参与式薪柴的可持续生产,尽管有其不足之处,但得到了国际捐助者的广泛支持。我们通过复制“政治森林”,分析了CAF模型令人惊讶的持久性,作为国家权力地域化的案例–借鉴了Peluso和Vandergeest(2001,2011)的工作。通过分析该模型的一些缺点和不连贯性,我们揭示了非国家行为者在CAF作为“政治森林”的复制中的作用。我们证明,在国家和非国家行为者(即商人和习惯性当局)之间已经出现了关于薪柴生产的非正式监管安排。我们称这些安排为“薪柴领域”,因为它们有助于保持CAF的资源模型不受质疑。对于薪柴领土,我们提请注意非国家行为者在“政治森林”繁殖中的作用,即通过森林治理进行国家领土化的过程。该分析有助于弄清某些区域(例如CAF)如何被正式表示为“森林”,即使它们被田野,休耕地和热带稀树草原所支配,却没有一个地区的生态特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号