首页> 外文期刊>Evolution >Can Willingness and Hands-on Work Together? Teaching Biological Evolution and Dealing with Barriers
【24h】

Can Willingness and Hands-on Work Together? Teaching Biological Evolution and Dealing with Barriers

机译:意愿和实践可以一起工作吗?教授生物进化论和处理障碍

获取原文
           

摘要

This qualitative research aims at first defining how pre-service science teachers think regarding the theory of evolution (TOE) with a particular hands-on and minds-on activity (The article by O’Brien (Am Biol Teach 62(8):578–582, 2000) entitled A toilet paper timeline of evolution: 5 E cycle on the concept of scale is modified and applied in the present research as an intervention process.) Finally, specific suggestions in instructional techniques are offered based on a geological time scale. At the end of intervention, the research follows how participants respond to what they found out or came across. If participants had common misconceptions regarding the TOE, these are revealed. The present research was conducted in two spring semesters of 2009 and 2010 in a geology course. The participant number of the study was 129. The research lasted three weeks. Research results showed that participants were generally misinformed regarding conceptual knowledge of the TOE. Approximately half of the participants did not believe (the term believing in or acceptance of the TOE does not affect research findings) in the TOE. Mostly, they thought that there is no place for human evolution in Islam. Few of them could reconcile scientific information with their own Islamic point of view. Even though they did not believe in the TOE, most of them accepted that they did not have adequate knowledge regarding the TOE. They mostly said they were shocked about the first appearance of human beings in the geological time scale, which is the main issue in the present research. After intervention, conceptual change was considerable, though this is a secondary concern. The results also show that even though students were quite prejudiced regarding the TOE, they were ready to explore it deeply. Such concrete activities might be helpful to push students to think over the TOE. However, there are numerous barriers such as ill-prepared science textbooks and websites, unwillingness of instructors, and official policy of the Ministry of National Education.
机译:这项定性研究的目的是首先定义职前科学老师对具有特定动手和思维活动的进化论(TOE)的看法(O'Brien的文章(Am Biol Teach 62(8):578) –582,2000年),标题为卫生纸的发展历程:对尺度概念的5 E周期进行了修改,并在本研究中作为干预过程应用。)最后,根据地质时间尺度在教学技术中提供了具体建议。在干预结束时,研究将跟踪参与者如何应对发现或遇到的问题。如果参与者对TOE有共同的误解,这些误解就可以发现。本研究是在2009年和2010年的两个春季学期的地质课程中进行的。该研究的参与者人数是129。研究持续了三周。研究结果表明,参与者通常对TOE的概念知识有误解。大约一半的参与者不相信TOE(相信或接受TOE这一术语不会影响研究结果)。大多数情况下,他们认为伊斯兰教没有人类进化的地方。他们中很少有人会以自己的伊斯兰观点调和科学信息。即使他们不相信TOE,他们中的大多数人也接受了他们对TOE没有足够的知识。他们大多说,他们对人类在地质时间尺度上的首次出现感到震惊,这是本研究的主要问题。进行干预之后,尽管这是次要的考虑,但是概念上的改变是相当大的。结果还表明,即使学生对TOE颇有偏见,他们也准备深入探索它。这种具体的活动可能有助于促使学生思考TOE。但是,存在许多障碍,例如科学课本和网站准备不足,教员不愿接受以及国家教育部的官方政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号