...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >The correlation between cervical range of motion and misplacement of cervical pedicle screws during cervical posterior spinal fixation surgery using a CT-based navigation system
【24h】

The correlation between cervical range of motion and misplacement of cervical pedicle screws during cervical posterior spinal fixation surgery using a CT-based navigation system

机译:基于CT导航系统的颈椎后路固定术中颈椎活动范围与椎弓根螺钉错位的相关性

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeThe aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between cervical range of motion and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) misplacement in cervical posterior spinal fusion surgery using a CT-based navigation system.MethodsA total of 46 consecutive patients with cervical posterior spinal fusion surgery using CPSs were evaluated retrospectively. We analyzed the cervical range of motion (ROM) and the misplacement of CPSs that were placed using either separate or single-time multilevel registration with a CT-based navigation system to determine the optimum registration procedure. The screw-inserted vertebra was indicated as Registered vertebra-Pedicle Screw inserted vertebra (Re-PS) = 0, 1, 2, or 3 depending on its distance (level) from the registered vertebra. Grades 0 (no perforation) and 1 (perforations 2 mm) were categorized as “no misplacement.” Grades 2 (perforations ≧2 mm but 4 mm) and 3 (perforations ≧ 4mm) were categorized as “misplacement.” We analyzed the correlations between CPS misplacement and Re-PS, and between CPS misplacement and preoperative cervical ROM.ResultsOur analysis included 196 screws in patients having a mean age of 53.2 years (range 5–84?years). Level of insertion relative to registration was Re-PS?=?0 in 129 screws, Re-PS?=?1 in 53, Re-PS?=?2 in 10 and Re-PS?=?3 in 4. The misplacement rates were 12.2?% (24 screws) overall, 6.2?% in Re-PS?=?0, 22.6?% in Re-PS?=?1, 20?% in Re-PS?=?2, and 50?% in Re-PS?=?3. The rate of CPS misplacement increased significantly with a Re-PS?=?1 and a Re-PS?=?2 and 3 compared to a Re-PS?=?0. There was a significant difference in the cervical ROM in each grade and both misplacement groups: 1.8 in Grade 0, 2.3 in Grade 1, 7.8 in Grade 2, 12.9 in Grade 3, 11 in the misplacement group and 1.9 in the no misplacement group.ConclusionsThe precision of CPS placement in CT-based navigation surgery was evaluated. The misplacement rate in single-time multilevel registration increased to 23.4?% compared to 6.2?% for separate registration. As the distance increased between the registered level and the level of CPS insertion, the preoperative cervical ROM and the rate of CPS misplacement significantly increased. Thus, the rate of misplacement of CPSs is reduced when performing separate registration. Furthermore, when there is greater preoperative cervical ROM, separate registration would likely improve the safety and accuracy of CPS insertion...
机译:目的本研究旨在分析基于CT导航系统的颈椎后路融合手术的颈椎活动范围与颈椎弓根螺钉(CPS)错位之间的相关性。方法总共46例连续的颈椎后路融合手术患者对CPS进行回顾性评估。我们分析了子宫颈活动范围(ROM)和CPS的错位,这些错位是通过基于CT的导航系统使用单独的或一次性的多级配准进行定位的,以确定最佳的配准程序。螺钉插入的椎骨表示为注册椎骨-椎弓根螺钉插入椎骨(Re-PS)取决于其与注册椎骨的距离(水平)= 0、1、2或3。 0级(无孔)和1级(孔<2 mm)被归类为“无错位”。 2级(穿孔≥2 mm但<4 mm)和3级(穿孔≥4mm)被归类为“错位”。我们分析了CPS错位与Re-PS之间以及CPS错位与术前宫颈ROM之间的相关性。结果我们的分析包括196枚螺钉,平均年龄为53.2岁(5-84岁)。相对于定位的插入水平为:129颗螺钉中的Re-PS?=?0,53中的Re-PS?=?1,Re-PS?=?2于10和Re-PS?=?3于4。总体上为12.2%(24个螺钉),Re-PS?=?0为6.2%,Re-PS?=?1为22.6%,Re-PS?=?2为20%。在Re-PS中的%≥3。与Re-PSα=α0相比,Re-PSα=α1和Re-PSα=α2和3时,CPS错位率显着增加。每个错位组和两个错位组的子宫颈ROM都有显着差异:错位组的0级为1.8、1级为2.3、2级为7.8、3级为12.9,无错位为1.9。结论评估了CPS在基于CT的导航手术中的放置精度。单次多层注册的错位率从单独注册的6.2%提高到23.4%。随着注册水平和CPS插入水平之间距离的增加,术前子宫颈ROM和CPS错位率显着增加。因此,当执行单独的配准时,降低了CPS的错位率。此外,当术前子宫颈ROM更大时,单独注册可能会提高CPS插入的安全性和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号