...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective analysis of autogenous grafting versus expandable cages
【24h】

Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective analysis of autogenous grafting versus expandable cages

机译:胸腰椎结核的外科手术治疗:自体移植与可扩张笼的回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeThere has been no uniform and extensive description of the use of expandable cages in the setting of thoracolumbar tuberculosis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of the expandable cages and compare with autogenous strut grafting in thoracolumbar tuberculosis.MethodsFrom January 2003 to January 2014, a total of 28 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis were treated surgically in our medical center. Patients were divided into three groups. 17 patients received anterior-only surgery; consisting of autogenous iliac bone grafting only in 9 (Group 1), grafting with anterior screw-rod system instrumentation after debridement in 8 patients (Group 2). 11 patients underwent anterior surgery including debridement and distraction of the kyphosis by cages after corpectomy following posterior instrumentation (Group 3).The changes in degree of kyphotic deformity, loss of correction, intervertebral height and loss of intervertebral height were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up.ResultsPatients were followed 52?±?10.7?months (range, 18–120?months). Mean age in the Group 1 was 42 (18–69)?years, 62 (19–86)?years in the Group 2 and 51 (19–71)?years in the Group 3. There was no statistically significant difference (P??0.05) in the focal kyphosis preoperatively, postoperatively and at the last follow-up between three groups. There were statistically significant differences (P??0.05) in loss of correction, intervertebral height (preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up) and loss of intervertebral height between three groups. There was a greater loss of correction in Group 1 when compared with Group 2 and Group 3. The difference was statistically significant (p??0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the intervertebral height postoperatively and follow-up between Group 1 and Group 2. There was a significant increase in the intervertebral height in Group 3 when compared with Group 1 and Group 2. There was also a significant increase in the intervertebral height in Group 2 when compared with Group 1. There was a greater loss of intervertebral height in Group 1 than in Group 2 and Group 3. The difference was statistically significant (p??0.001).ConclusionsExpandable cages are an acceptable surgical option for the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis. Sagittal alignment is better prevented with the expandable cages than anterior grafting with or without anterior instrumentation. Subsidence of the expandable cages is not uncommon and results in the loss of Cobb angle correction and intervertebral height. However, anterior vertebral column reconstruction by expandable cages provides a very high and effective rate of deformity correction and maintenance...
机译:目的对于胸腰部结核病的使用,尚无统一和广泛的描述。该研究的目的是评估可扩张笼的结果,并与自体撑杆肺移植进行比较。方法2003年1月至2014年1月,在我们的医疗中心对28例胸腰椎结核患者进行了手术治疗。患者分为三组。 17例接受了前路手术;仅在9例中进行了自体骨移植(第1组),在清创后使用前螺杆系统器械进行了8例患者的移植(第2组)。 11例患者接受了后路器械后体切除术后进行了前路手术,包括清创术和笼子切除后凸畸形(第3组)。评估了后凸畸形程度,矫正丧失,椎体高度和椎体高度丧失的变化。结果随访患者52?±?10.7?月(范围18–120?月)。第一组的平均年龄为42(18-69)岁,第二组为62(19-86)岁,第三组为51(19-71)岁。在统计学上无显着差异(P三组之间在术前,术后和最后一次随访中,≥50)。三组之间的矫正丧失,椎体高度(术前,术后和最终随访)和椎体高度丧失在统计学上有显着性差异(P≤0.05)。与第2组和第3组相比,第1组的矫正损失更大。差异具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。第1组和第2组之间的椎间高度没有统计学差异。与第1组和第2组相比,第3组的椎间高度显着增加。与第1组相比,第2组的椎间高度高。与第2组和第3组相比,第1组的椎间高度损失更大。差异具有统计学意义(p <0.001)。结论扩张式笼是可以接受的外科手术治疗胸腰结核的选择。用可扩张的笼子比使用或不使用前侧器械的前路移植能更好地防止矢状位对准。可膨胀的笼子的下陷并不少见,并且会导致Cobb角矫正和椎间高度的损失。然而,通过可扩张的笼子重建椎体前柱可提供非常高且有效的畸形校正和维持率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号