...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the English-language literature
【24h】

Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the English-language literature

机译:颈椎计算机断层扫描计算出的椎弓根和骨性椎管尺寸的种族差异:英语文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeThe aims of this study were to review published data on pedicle dimensions and bony spinal canal diameters calculated from CT examinations of the cervical spine through the English-language literature and analyze these data for ethnic disparities and similarities.Materials and methods The authors reviewed the literature on “pedicle” and “spinal canal” by conducting a bibliographic search using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Science Direct from January 1985 to December 2010. After evaluating all of the selected abstracts, we ultimately selected 19 studies involving living subjects: 12 studies on pedicle dimensions and 7 on spinal canal diameters. The four parameters, pedicle width (PW), pedicle transverse angle (PTA), anterior-posterior diameter of the spinal canal (APD), and transverse diameter of the spinal canal (TD), were analyzed at the relevant levels from C3 to C7. In addition, the values for pedicle dimensions and spinal canal diameters in the European/American populations were compared using the data from Asian populations as a baseline.Results The smallest mean PW was found at C4 in the male (5.1?mm) and female populations (4.1?mm); the largest mean PW was found at C7 in both male (7.7?mm) and female populations (7?mm). The PW in males was greater than in females at the majority of levels. The smallest mean PTA was found at C7 in both male (33.4°) and female populations (33°); the largest mean PTA was found at C4 in both male (53.2°) and female populations (52.1°). The overall PW, PTA, APD, and TD ratio of European/American to Asian populations was 91.4–98.8, 99.6–106.2, 110.7–122, and 100–108.3?%, respectively.Conclusion Although our cervical spine CT data were suggestive of possible ethnic differences in spinal canal morphology, our analysis failed to identify significant ethnic disparity in pedicle dimensions despite potential differences in physique between populations...
机译:目的本研究的目的是回顾通过英语文献从颈椎CT检查计算出的椎弓根尺寸和骨性椎管直径的公开数据,并分析这些数据的族裔差异和相似之处。 1985年1月至2010年12月,使用PubMed,Ovid MEDLINE和Science Direct进行书目搜索,研究“椎弓根”和“椎管”。在评估了所有选定摘要之后,我们最终选择了19项涉及生活受试者的研究:椎弓根的尺寸和7的椎管直径。在从C3到C7的相关水平上分析了椎弓根宽度(PW),椎弓根横向角度(PTA),椎管的前后直径(APD)和椎管的横向直径(TD)四个参数。此外,以亚洲人群的数据为基准,比较了欧洲/美洲人群的椎弓根尺寸和椎管直径值。结果男性(5.1?mm)和女性人群的C4最小平均PW (4.1?mm);在男性(7.7?mm)和女性(7?mm)人群中,C7的平均PW最大。在大多数水平上,男性的PW大于女性。在男性(33.4°)和女性(33°)人群中C7的平均PTA最小。在男性(53.2°)和女性(52.1°)人群中,在C4均发现最大的PTA平均值。欧洲/美洲人口与亚洲人口的总体PW,PTA,APD和TD比率分别为91.4–98.8、99.6–106.2、110.7–122和100–108.3?%。结论尽管我们的颈椎CT数据提示椎管形态可能存在种族差异,尽管人群之间的体质可能存在差异,但我们的分析未能确定椎弓根维度上的显着种族差异...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号