...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking
【24h】

A prospective randomized controlled study comparing the pain relief in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with the use of vertebroplasty or facet blocking

机译:一项前瞻性随机对照研究,比较了骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者与椎骨整形术或小平面阻滞术的止痛效果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeTo compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus those undergoing facet blocking (FB) for severe pain due to osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).MethodsTwo hundred and six patients who had OVCFs on spine radiography and intractable back pain for ≤8?weeks were recruited between January 2009 and January 2013 (165 females and 41 males, age ≥55?years). Patients were randomly assigned to the PVP group (100 patients) or the FB group (106 patients). VAS, ODI, Roland Morris disability (RMD) scores, scores on the Standardized Physical Component of the SF-36 form (SPC) and scores on the Standardized Mental Component of the SF-36 form (SMC) were determined preoperatively and at each follow-up time (1?day, 1?week, 1, 3, 6, and 12?months). In addition, plain radiographs were obtained at 3, 6, and 12?months postoperatively to detect new fractures.ResultsSignificantly lower VAS, ODI, and RMD scores for patients in the PVP group compared to those in the FB group were observed at follow-up of 1?day and 1?week (p??0.05). However, differences in the VAS, ODI, RMD and SPC/MCS (SF-36) scores between the two groups at follow-ups of more than 1?month were statistically insignificant (p??0.05). Difference in numbers of new fractures in the two groups at the follow-up of 12?months was also statistically insignificant.ConclusionsPVP produced better pain relief than FB in the short term (≤1?week). However, the difference in pain-relief between these two techniques was insignificant in the long term (follow-up between 1 month and 12?months)...
机译:目的比较经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与经小平面阻塞(FB)治疗因骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)引起的严重疼痛的患者的临床和放射学结果。方法206例经脊柱X线检查和顽固性背部OVCF的患者在2009年1月至2013年1月之间招募了≤8周的疼痛(女性165位,男性41位,年龄≥55岁)。将患者随机分为PVP组(100例)或FB组(106例)。术前和每次随访时都要确定VAS,ODI,Roland Morris残疾(RMD)得分,SF-36形式(SPC)的标准化身体成分得分和SF-36形式(SMC)的标准化心理成分得分准备时间(每天1天,每周1周,1、3、6和12个月)。此外,在术后3、6和12个月时获得了X线平片,以发现新的骨折。结果随访时,PVP组患者的VAS,ODI和RMD评分明显低于FB组。 1天和1周的时间(p <0.05)。但是,两组在随访超过1个月时,VAS,ODI,RMD和SPC / MCS(SF-36)评分差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。两组在12个月的随访中新骨折的数量差异也无统计学意义。结论在短期内(≤1星期),PVP的疼痛缓解效果优于FB。但是,从长期来看,这两种技术在缓解疼痛方面的差异并不明显(随访时间在1个月至12个月之间)...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号