...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Assessment of epidural versus intradiscal biocompatibility of PEEK implant debris: an in vivo rabbit model
【24h】

Assessment of epidural versus intradiscal biocompatibility of PEEK implant debris: an in vivo rabbit model

机译:PEEK植入物碎片的硬膜外与椎间盘内生物相容性评估:体内兔模型

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeTo understand the relative histopathological effects of PEEK particulate debris when applied within the epidural versus the intervertebral disc space. We hypothesized that due to the avascular nature of the intervertebral disc acting as a barrier to immune cells, the intradiscal response would be less than the epidural response.MethodsThe inflammatory effects of clinically relevant doses (3?mg/5-kg rabbit) and sizes (1.15?μm diameter) of PEEK implant debris were assed when placed dry on epidural and intradiscal tissues in an in vivo rabbit model. The size of the particulate was based on wear particulate analysis of wear debris generated from simulator wear testing of PEEK spinal disc arthroplasty devices. Local and systemic gross histology was evaluated at the 3- and 6-month time points. Quantitative immunohistochemistry of local tissues was used to quantify the common inflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.ResultsBoth treatments did not alter the normal appearance of the dura mater and vascular structures; however, limited epidural fibrosis was observed. Epidural challenge of PEEK particles resulted in a significant (30?%) increase (p??0.007) in TNF-α and IL-1β at both 3 and 6?months compared to that of controls, and IL-6 at 6?months (p??0.0001). Intradiscal challenge of PEEK particles resulted in a significant increase in IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α at 6-months post-challenge (p?≤?0.03). However, overall there were only moderate increases in the relative amount of these cytokines when compared with surgical controls (10–20?%). In contrast, epidural challenge resulted in a 50–100?% increase.ConclusionsThe results of this study are similar to past investigations of PEEK, whose results have not been shown to elicit an aggressive immune response. The degree to which these results will translate to the clinical environment remains to be established, but the pattern of subtle elevations in inflammatory cytokines indicated both a mild persistence of responses to PEEK debris, and that intradiscal implant debris will likely result in less inflammation than epidural implant debris...
机译:目的了解当在硬膜外与椎间盘间隙内应用PEEK颗粒碎片的相对组织病理学影响。我们假设由于椎间盘的无血管特性可作为免疫细胞的屏障,因此椎间盘内反应将小于硬膜外反应。方法临床相关剂量(3?mg / 5-kg兔)和大小的炎性影响在体内兔模型中,将PEEK植入物碎片(直径1.15?m直径)干燥放置在硬膜外和椎间盘内组织上。颗粒的大小基于对PEEK椎间盘置换设备的模拟器磨损测试产生的磨损碎片的磨损颗粒分析。在3个月和6个月的时间点评估局部和全身大体组织学。局部组织的定量免疫组织化学方法用于量化常见的炎症介质TNF-α,IL-1β和IL-6。结果两种治疗均未改变硬脑膜和血管结构的正常外观。然而,观察到有限的硬膜外纤维化。 PEEK颗粒的硬膜外刺激导致与对照组相比,在3个月和6个月时TNF-α和IL-1β显着增加(30%)(p 0.007),在6个月时IL-6显着增加。月(p?<?0.0001)。在攻击后6个月,PEEK颗粒的放射性刺激导致IL-1β,IL-6和TNF-α显着增加(p≤≤0.03)。但是,总体而言,与手术对照组相比,这些细胞因子的相对数量仅适度增加(10–20%)。相比之下,硬膜外刺激导致增加50-100%。结论本研究的结果与PEEK的以往研究相似,其结果尚未显示出引起激进的免疫反应。这些结果将转化为临床环境的程度仍有待确定,但是炎症细胞因子的微弱升高模式表明,对PEEK碎屑的反应持续存在轻度持续性,而椎间盘植入物碎屑可能比硬膜外的结石引起的炎症更少植入物碎片...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号