...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Economics >Double dividend hypothesis: Can it be validated by carbon taxation swap with payroll taxes?
【24h】

Double dividend hypothesis: Can it be validated by carbon taxation swap with payroll taxes?

机译:双重股息假说:能否通过工资税与碳税互换来验证?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper is concerned with the proficiency assessment of the environmental tax reform to tackle the pollution and simultaneously decrease the tax burden of pre-existent labor taxation. In comparison with mainstream literature, we focus exclusively on the reduction of the tax distortions that affect labor demand, using the revenues generated by environmental levies. Our starting point is the double dividend hypothesis with respect to the environmental taxation. The main objective of this paper is to validate the second dividend hypothesis, hence testing the carbon taxation ability to reduce harmful effects of taxes on inputs such as labor. Following the trajectory of the double dividend hypothesis, the paper examines the potential of carbon taxation enactment accompanied by the payroll tax cuts in order to lower the efficiency costs of these pre-existent distortionary taxes. The feasibility of tax swap mechanism between environmental and payroll taxation is verified through estimating and comparing their efficiency costs. The results obtained from empirical analysis confirm that there is a high potential of swapping these taxes and implementing offsetting measures, where the efficiency costs of payroll taxation are considerably larger than of environmental taxation. Hence, we conclude that there is “enough room” for this tax swap mechanism to take place which would have a two-folded outcome – environment protection improvement and decreasing the efficiency costs of the fiscal system. Given the fact that the efficiency costs of environmental taxes are considerably lower (both in absolute and percentage values), than payroll taxation in the EU, it is possible to apply payroll tax cuts and consequently increase the ratio of environmental taxation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.1.8399
机译:本文关注环境税改革的熟练程度评估,以解决污染问题并同时减轻既有劳动税的税收负担。与主流文献相比,我们仅着眼于利用环境税产生的收入来减少影响劳动力需求的税收扭曲。我们的出发点是关于环境税收的双重股息假说。本文的主要目的是验证第二个股息假设,从而测试碳征税能力,以减少税收对诸如劳动力等投入品的有害影响。遵循双重股息假说的轨迹,本文研究了伴随减税而实施碳税的潜力,以降低这些先前存在的扭曲税的效率成本。通过估算和比较其效率成本,验证了环境税和工资税之间的税收互换机制的可行性。从经验分析获得的结果证实,交换这些税并实施抵消措施的潜力很大,因为工资税的效率成本比环境税大得多。因此,我们得出结论,这种税收互换机制的实施有“足够的空间”,其结果有两个方面-改善环境保护和降低财政系统的效率成本。鉴于环境税的效率成本(绝对值和百分比值)都比欧盟的工资税低得多,因此有可能实行工资税减免,从而提高了环境税的比例。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.1.8399

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号