...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Research Letters >Conspiratory fascination versus public interest: the case of ‘climategate’*
【24h】

Conspiratory fascination versus public interest: the case of ‘climategate’*

机译:阴谋迷恋与公共利益:“气候门” *

获取原文
           

摘要

Anderegg and Goldsmith (2014 Environ. Res. Lett. 9 054005) use Google Trends to examine the impact of specific media events—the so-called 'climategate' imbroglio and the glacial-melt error in the IPCC?s 2007 report—on public opinion regarding climate change. There has been an overall decline of public interest in climate change after 2007, accompanied by spikes of interest with a half-life of six days for these two media events. The brevity of public interest in 'climategate' stands in contrast to the continued and growing fascination of the 'skeptic' blogosphere with that event. These results document the assertion that conspiratory obsession by a small number of people should not be mistaken for general public interest.
机译:Anderegg和Goldsmith(2014 Environ。Res。Lett。9 054005)使用Google趋势公开检查了特定媒体事件(IPCC 2007年报告中所谓的“气候门”污染和冰川融化错误)的影响。关于气候变化的意见。 2007年之后,公众对气候变化的整体兴趣下降了,与此同时,这两次媒体事件的半衰期为6天,引起了公众的关注。与“怀疑论”博客圈对这一事件的持续和日益浓厚的兴趣形成鲜明对比的是,“气候门”的公众利益简短。这些结果证明了这样的主张,即少数人对串谋的迷恋不应被误认为是普遍的公共利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号