首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Noninvasive proportional assist ventilation may be useful in weaning patients who failed spontaneous breathing trial
【24h】

Noninvasive proportional assist ventilation may be useful in weaning patients who failed spontaneous breathing trial

机译:无创比例辅助通气可能对自发呼吸试验失败的断奶患者有用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Endotracheal mechanical ventilation (ETMV) is accompanied with a high morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effectiveness of noninvasive proportional assist ventilation (PAV) as a method of weaning in patients who could not tolerate spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Patients and methods Among 112 patients presented with acute respiratory failure (ARF) admitted to Zagazig university surgical ICU, 42 patients of them failed a 2 h-SBT after they met simple criteria for weaning. Conventional invasive synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) was used as the control weaning technique in 21 patients (SIMV group), and noninvasive PAV was applied immediately after extubation in the remaining 21 patients (PAV group). Results There was no significant difference regarding the main clinical, functional characteristics, and the physiologic parameters of the two weaning groups at the time of their admission. Gas exchange at 1-h post-randomisation was significantly improved in both groups. The duration of ventilatory support was significantly shorter in the PAV group (12.8 + 8.3 days vs 22.3 + 13.3 days in the conventional group; P 0.05). Weaning success was significantly higher in the PAV group (18 patients“85%” vs 11 patients “52 %” in the conventional group P 0.05). ICU survival was higher, while, reintubation rate was lower in PAV (three patients “14%” vs 10 patients “47%” in the conventional group; P 0.05). The rate of tracheostomy was significantly lower in the PAV group (one patient “4%” vs seven patients “33%” in the conventional group; P 0.05). The incidence of VAP was higher in the conventional group (eight patients “38%” vs one patient “4%”in the PAV group; P 0.05). Conclusion Noninvasive PAV could be considered as an effective and safe method of weaning in patients who cannot tolerate 2 h-SBT.
机译:背景气管内机械通气(ETMV)在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中具有较高的发病率和死亡率。这项前瞻性随机对照研究的目的是评估无创比例辅助通气(PAV)作为不能耐受自发呼吸试验(SBT)的患者的断奶方法的有效性。患者和方法在Zagazig大学外科ICU住院的112例急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者中,有42例在满足简单的断奶标准后2 h-SBT失败。传统的侵入性同步间歇性强制通气(SIMV)被用作21例患者(SIMV组)的对照断奶技术,其余21例(PAV组)拔管后立即应用了非侵入性PAV。结果两组断奶组在入院时的主要临床,功能特点和生理参数无显着差异。两组在随机分配后1小时的气体交换均得到显着改善。 PAV组通气支持的持续时间显着缩短(常规组为12.8 + 8.3天,而常规组为22.3 + 13.3天; P <0.05)。 PAV组的断奶成功率明显更高(常规组中18例“ 85%”,而11例“ 52%” P <0.05)。 ICU存活率较高,而PAV的再插管率较低(常规组中3例“ 14%”,10例“ 47%”; P <0.05)。 PAV组的气管切开术率显着降低(常规组中1例“ 4%”比7例“ 33%”; P <0.05)。常规组中VAP的发生率更高(PAV组中8例患者为“ 38%”,而1例患者为“ 4%”; P <0.05)。结论无创性PAV可以作为不能耐受2 h-SBT的断奶患者的一种安全有效的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号