...
首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Pilot study on uncertainty analysis in EFSA Reasoned Opinions on the modification of pesticide maximum residue levels
【24h】

Pilot study on uncertainty analysis in EFSA Reasoned Opinions on the modification of pesticide maximum residue levels

机译:EFSA关于修改农药最大残留量的合理意见中不确定性分析的试验研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Applicability of the EFSA Scientific Committee revised draft Guidance on uncertainty in EFSA scientific assessment is tested in the context of an EFSA Reasoned Opinion on the modification of pesticide maximum residue levels (MRLs). EFSA purchased services for the preparation of a non‐regulatory Evaluation Report with example non‐standard uncertainties related to a fictitious application for the modification of MRLs. The Evaluation Report was assessed by EFSA in the format of a Reasoned Opinion and case‐specific examples of non‐standard uncertainty in the acute and chronic dietary risk assessments were analysed. Methods were selected from the general framework outlined in the Scientific Committee draft Guidance in order to apply a relatively simple strategy that could be considered for use in a regulatory context. The individual non‐standard uncertainties were assessed by sensitivity analysis with iterative back‐calculation of the parameter values that would lead to exceedance of the toxicological reference value (exceedance limit calculation), and quantified by subjective probability estimation. Non‐standard uncertainties affecting the chronic risk assessment were quantified by subjective upper bound probability percentile estimation and the combined estimated non‐standard uncertainty calculated by probability bounds analysis. Probability bounds analysis provides a relatively simple approach for calculating the probability related to a combination of uncertainties. The draft Guidance was found to provide a comprehensive range of methods for uncertainty analysis. However, process‐specific guidelines and practical procedures may need to be developed in order to implement the uncertainty assessment framework in routine pesticide risk assessments. The uncertainty assessment is intended to provide additional information on how certain the conclusions of the risk assessment are and thereby support the risk‐based decision‐making process by enabling risk managers to take account of uncertainty. The outcome of the pilot study will inform the EFSA Scientific Committee Working Group on how to further tailor the draft Guidance on uncertainty for the needs of the EFSA panels and units.
机译:EFSA科学委员会修订后的EFSA科学评估不确定性指南草案的适用性在EFSA关于修改农药最大残留量(MRL)的EFSA合理意见的背景下进行了测试。 EFSA购买了服务,以准备一份非监管评估报告,该报告具有与虚假修改MRL的申请相关的非标准不确定性示例。 EFSA以“合理意见”的形式对“评估报告”进行了评估,并分析了针对具体案例的急性和慢性饮食风险评估中非标准不确定性的实例。从科学委员会指南草案中概述的总体框架中选择方法,以便应用可以考虑在监管环境中使用的相对简单的策略。通过敏感性分析对参数值进行迭代反算,以评估可能导致超出毒理学参考值(超限计算)的单个非标准不确定性,并通过主观概率估计进行量化。通过主观上限概率百分位估计和通过概率边界分析计算的组合估计非标准不确定性,可以量化影响慢性风险评估的非标准不确定性。概率边界分析提供了一种相对简单的方法来计算与不确定性组合有关的概率。发现指南草案为不确定性分析提供了广泛的方法。但是,可能需要制定针对过程的指南和实践程序,以便在常规农药风险评估中实施不确定性评估框架。不确定性评估旨在提供有关风险评估结论如何确定的更多信息,从而通过使风险管理人员能够考虑不确定性来支持基于风险的决策过程。试点研究的结果将为EFSA科学委员会工作组提供有关如何进一步根据EFSA小组和单位的需求确定不确定性指南草案的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号