...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth System Dynamics Discussions >Annual and semiannual cycles of midlatitude near-surface temperature and tropospheric baroclinicity: reanalysis data and AOGCM simulations
【24h】

Annual and semiannual cycles of midlatitude near-surface temperature and tropospheric baroclinicity: reanalysis data and AOGCM simulations

机译:中纬度近地表温度和对流层斜压的年度和半年周期:再分析数据和AOGCM模拟

获取原文
           

摘要

Seasonal variability in near-surface air temperature and baroclinicity from the ECMWF ERA-Interim (ERAI) reanalysis and six coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase?3 and?5 (CMIP3 and CMIP5) are examined. In particular, the annual and semiannual cycles of hemispherically averaged fields are studied using spectral analysis. The aim is to assess the ability of coupled general circulation models to properly reproduce the observed amplitude and phase of these cycles, and investigate the relationship between near-surface temperature and baroclinicity (coherency and relative phase) in such frequency bands. The overall results of power spectra agree in displaying a statistically significant peak at the annual frequency in the zonally averaged fields of both hemispheres. The semiannual peak, instead, shows less power and in the NH seems to have a more regional character, as is observed in the North Pacific Ocean region. Results of bivariate analysis for such a region and Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes show some discrepancies between ERAI and model data, as well as among models, especially for the semiannual frequency. Specifically, (i)?the coherency at the annual and semiannual frequency observed in the reanalysis data is well represented by models in both hemispheres, and (ii)?at the annual frequency, estimates of the relative phase between near-surface temperature and baroclinicity are bounded between about ±15° around an average value of 220° (i.e., approximately 1-month phase shift), while at the semiannual frequency model phases show a wider dispersion in both hemispheres with larger errors in the estimates, denoting increased uncertainty and some disagreement among models. The most recent CMIP climate models (CMIP5) show several improvements when compared with CMIP3, but a degree of discrepancy still persists though masked by the large errors characterizing the semiannual frequency. These findings contribute to better characterizing the cyclic response of current global atmosphere–ocean models to the external (solar) forcing that is of interest for seasonal forecasts.
机译:来自ECMWF ERA中期(ERAI)再分析和参与耦合模型比较项目阶段3和5(CMIP3和CMIP5)的六个大气-海洋总体环流模型(AOGCM)的近地表气温和气压斜率的季节性变化。被检查。特别是,使用光谱分析研究了半球平均场的年度和半年周期。目的是评估耦合的一般循环模型正确再现这些周期观察到的振幅和相位的能力,并研究在这些频带中近地表温度与斜压(相干和相对相位)之间的关系。功率谱的总体结果在两个半球的纬向平均场中在年频率处显示出统计学上显着的峰值相吻合。相反,每半年一次的峰值显示的功率较小,并且在北半球似乎具有更大的区域特征,如在北太平洋地区所观察到的。对此类地区和南半球中纬度的双变量分析结果显示,ERAI与模型数据之间以及模型之间,尤其是半年度频率之间存在一些差异。具体而言,(i)在再分析数据中观察到的每年和半年度频率的相干性在两个半球模型中都得到了很好的表示,并且(ii)在每年的频率上,近地表温度与斜压之间的相对相位的估计在大约220°的平均值附近(即大约1个月的相移)限制在±15°之间,而在半年度频率模型中,相位在两个半球中表现出更宽的离散度,且估计误差较大,表示不确定性和模型之间存在一些分歧。与CMIP3相比,最新的CMIP气候模型(CMIP5)表现出一些改进,但是尽管被半年度频率特征的大误差掩盖了,但差异仍然存在。这些发现有助于更好地刻画当前全球大气-海洋模型对外部(太阳)强迫的周期性响应,这是季节性预报所感兴趣的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号