...
首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >A Novel Treatment For Severely Porotic Humerus Non Union With Plate And Rush Pin: A Report Of 2 Cases
【24h】

A Novel Treatment For Severely Porotic Humerus Non Union With Plate And Rush Pin: A Report Of 2 Cases

机译:钢板和急针治疗严重多孔性肱骨不愈合的新方法:附2例报告

获取原文
           

摘要

The management of humerus non union in severely porotic bone mainly encountered in the elderly is challenging .The incidence of nonunion is higher in cases involving porotic bones. Non unions can result in significant patient morbidity by limiting activities of daily living due to pain and loss of function especially in the elderly. The literature is replete with studies outlining the various methods of treating humeral shaft non unions with severely porotic bones following primary operative management. However no study describes combining a plate and rush pin together with cancellous bone graft for severely porotic humerus non unions. We have applied this technique in 2 cases of previously plated porotic humerus non unions in the elderly with good results. This technique could be a very useful procedure in underdeveloped countries and rural hospitals where facilities like methylmethacrylate, a plate with a blade and spiked nuts that lock the screws to the plate are not available. Introduction The incidence of nonunion after operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures has been reported to range between 2.5 and 13 percent.1,2,3.The incidence is higher in cases involving porotic bones. Non unions can result in significant patient morbidity by limiting activities of daily living due to pain and loss of function. Revision surgical management is indicated for treatment of non unions following an initial failed surgical procedure. The literature is replete with studies outlining the various methods of treating humeral shaft non unions with severely porotic bones following primary operative management 4,5, 6,7, 8.We hereby describe a technique of combining a plate and rush pin together with cancellous bone graft for severely porotic humerus non unions. We have applied this technique in 2 cases of previously plated porotic humerus non unions in the elderly. Materials and Methods This prospective study was conducted at Presbyterian Church of East Africa (PCEA) Kikuyu Hospital, Orthopedic Unit from October 2007 to April 2008. Two consecutive patients with nonunion of the humeral diaphysis after plating with severe porosis were reviewed and evaluated. A plate and rush pin with cancellous iliac crest bone graft was used to treat the nonunion. The tool for data collection was a predesigned data sheet to collect information on the cases. The questionnaire contained information on age, sex, co-morbid conditions, mechanism of injury, fracture location, initial treatment of the fracture, time from injury to definitive treatment, definitive treatment, time taken to unite, function and complications.In this study, nonunion was defined as absence of radiographic signs of union and persistent pain on clinical examination 6 months after injury 9. A fracture between the superior border of the pectoralis major insertion and 2cm above the olecranon fossa was defined as a diaphyseal humerus fracture 10.Records of patients were reviewed for history, physical examination, operative reports, and all radiographs. Laboratory studies included a hemoglobin level, urinalysis and random blood sugar where indicated. Surgical Technique The patient was put under general anesthesia then prepared and draped in a standard manner as for humerus plating using the approach that was previously used. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered. The radial nerve was identified and protected for the duration of the procedure in posterior or lateral approaches. The previous implants were removed. The intramedullary canal was reconstituted with a drill and bone ends were contoured to provide adequate diaphyseal contact. Once the fracture was reduced, the rush pin that had been cut preoperatively was inserted antegrade from the tip of greater tuberosity into the medullary canal of distal fragment through a 4 cm incision made over greater tuberosity ,lateral to acromion. Then a 4.5mm DCP plate was fixed based on the approach used. The screws were inserted slightly oblique to
机译:主要在老年人中遇到的严重骨质疏松骨中肱骨不愈合的管理具有挑战性。在涉及骨质疏松性骨的病例中,骨不连的发生率较高。非工会可以通过限制由于疼痛和功能丧失而引起的日常生活活动(特别是在老年人中)而导致严重的患者发病。文献中充斥着概述在初次手术治疗后用严重疏松性骨治疗肱骨干不愈合的各种方法的研究。然而,尚无研究描述将钢板和钉与松质骨移植物结合用于严重的多孔性肱骨非愈合。我们将这种技术应用于2例以前曾在老年人中接种过的多孔性肱骨不愈合患者,取得了良好的效果。在不发达的国家和乡村医院中,此技术可能是非常有用的程序,因为那里没有甲基丙烯酸甲酯,带刀片的板以及将螺钉锁定在板上的带帽螺母的设施。前言据报道,肱骨干骨折手术治疗后骨不连的发生率在2.5%到13%之间。1,2,3。非工会会由于疼痛和功能丧失而限制日常生活活动,从而导致患者大量发病。最初的手术失败后,建议对非工会患者进行手术治疗。文献中充斥着研究,概述了在首次手术管理4,5,6,7,8后采用严重疏松性骨治疗肱骨干不愈合的多种方法。严重的多孔性肱骨非愈合组织。我们已将此技术应用于2例以前曾在老年人中接种过的多孔性肱骨不愈合患者。材料与方法这项前瞻性研究于2007年10月至2008年4月在东非长老教会(PCEA)骨科医院,骨科进行。回顾和评估了连续2例患有严重骨质疏松症的肱骨骨干骨不连的患者。使用带有松质骨骨移植的板和冲销治疗骨不连。数据收集工具是一个预先设计的数据表,用于收集有关案件的信息。该问卷包含以下信息:年龄,性别,合并症,损伤机理,骨折部位,骨折的初始治疗,从受伤到确定的治疗时间,确定的治疗,团结所需的时间,功能和并发症。骨不愈合的定义为受伤9个月后6个月临床检查无放射学影像学表现和持续疼痛。胸大肌大插入上缘与鹰嘴窝上方2厘米之间的骨折被定义为干端肱骨骨折。10回顾患者的病史,体格检查,手术报告和所有X光片。实验室检查包括血红蛋白水平,尿液分析和随机血糖。手术技术将患者置于全身麻醉下,然后使用以前使用的方法以标准方式将其覆盖于肱骨板。给予预防性抗生素。在后入路或侧入路的整个过程中,identified神经得到了识别和保护。先前的植入物被移除。用钻头重建髓内管,并勾勒出骨端的轮廓,以提供充分的干phy端接触。骨折复位后,将术前已切开的针从较大结节的尖端顺行插入,通过4 cm较大的结节(距肩峰外侧)切开,将其插入远端碎片的髓管。然后根据所使用的方法固定一块4.5mm DCP板。将螺丝稍微倾斜地插入

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号