...
首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Management Of High Energy Tibial Fractures Using The Ilizarov Apparatus
【24h】

Management Of High Energy Tibial Fractures Using The Ilizarov Apparatus

机译:使用Ilizarov仪器管理高能胫骨骨折

获取原文
           

摘要

Forty-two high-energy tibial fractures (18 closed and 24 open) in 41 patients were treated with the Ilizarov apparatus between 1999 and 2004. Open wounds were debrided and tension free primary closure using interrupted nylon sutures was attempted wherever appropriate. In others, either split thickness skin grafting or local gastrocnemius flaps were used. Corticotomy and bone transport was instituted in patients with significant bone loss. Early weight bearing with range of motion exercises of ankle and knee joints were encouraged. Average fracture healing time was 5.3 months (range 3.5 - 8.5 months). Complications included pin site inflammation / infection (40.4 %), muscle transfixation (2 cases), shortening (3 cases), ankle joint stiffness (2 cases) and wire fracture (1 case). Based on Johner and Wruh's Criteria, there were 34 excellent, 6 good, 2 fair, and no poor results. The Ilizarov device provided early and definitive fixation for high-energy tibial fractures with good results. Introduction Fractures of tibia are very common in patients with trauma (1). Their treatment, prognosis, and outcome are mainly determined by the mechanism of injury, degree of resulting comminution, soft tissue injury and displacement (2). Fractures produced by indirect trauma have a better prognosis than those produced by direct trauma (3,4). The risk of delayed union and nonunion in closed (1,4) and open treatment is increased with comminution (5). Open fractures have a higher infection rate than closed fractures (6) and the rate increases with the increasing severity of the soft tissue injury (7,8). Minimally displaced fractures allow more simple treatment than displaced fractures (1). Therefore high-energy injuries have added to the number and complexity of fractures of long bones, especially those of tibia and so have the treatment modalities addressing them. We evaluated the use of Ilizarov device as the initial and definitive mode of fracture stabilization of these fractures. Materials And Methods From 1999 to 2004, 42 high-energy tibial fractures in 41 patients (37 male, 4 female) were treated primarily with Ilizarov apparatus. Grade III open and/or comminuted tibial fractures was the major inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria included low energy fractures; grade 3C open fractures and patients who found the apparatus aesthetically unacceptable. The mean age was 39.1 years (range, 14-65 years). Road traffic accidents were responsible for majority of cases (33). Three of the fractures were segmental, and 1 was bilateral. Four patients had multiple traumas. There were 18 closed fractures and 24 open fractures. Using the Gustilo and Anderson (8) classification, 4 were Grade I, 3 were Grade II, 8 were Grade IIIA and 9 were Grade IIIB. There were 21 proximal metaphyseal, 17 diaphyseal and 3 distal metaphyseal fractures.Informed consent was obtained in all cases. All open wounds were irrigated copiously with normal saline followed by debridement of all the devitalised bone and soft tissue. Antibiotic treatment was initiated in the emergency room with Cefazolin given intravenously for all open fractures and additional gentamycin for Grade III open fractures. The antibiotics were given for 3 days in type I and II wounds and for 5 days for type III wounds. Tension free primary closure using interrupted nylon sutures was attempted wherever appropriate. If safe closure could not be accomplished, the size of the wound was minimised by mobilization of the adjacent tissues over the bone with or without additional split thickness skin grafting. All the Grade IIIA fractures were closed successfully with no wound complications. Of the Grade IIIB fractures, 2 wounds could be successfully approximated and four cases required a gastrocnemius flap. Two patients with a Grade IIIB comminuted fracture presented late after injury with wound infection. A thorough debridement of all the devitalized bone, soft tissue and the infected material was done with primary
机译:在1999年至2004年之间,使用Ilizarov器械治疗了41例患者的42例高能胫骨骨折(闭合的18处和闭合的24处)。对开放的伤口进行清创术,并在适当的情况下尝试使用间断性尼龙缝线进行无张力的初次闭合。在其他情况下,则使用厚薄的皮肤移植术或局部腓肠肌瓣。在骨质流失严重的患者中进行了皮质切开术和骨运输。鼓励早期负重进行踝关节和膝关节的运动锻炼。平均骨折愈合时间为5.3个月(范围3.5-8.5个月)。并发症包括针位发炎/感染(40.4%),肌肉固定(2例),缩短(3例),踝关节僵硬(2例)和钢丝断裂(1例)。根据Johner和Wruh的标准,有34优,6优,2中等,并且没有差的结果。 Ilizarov装置为高能胫骨骨折提供了早期的确定性固定,效果良好。简介胫骨骨折在外伤患者中非常普遍(1)。它们的治疗,预后和结果主要取决于损伤的机制,粉碎的程度,软组织损伤和移位(2)。间接创伤产生的骨折比直接创伤产生的骨折预后更好(3,4)。粉碎(5)增加了封闭(1,4)和开放治疗延迟工会和骨不连的风险。开放性骨折的感染率高于闭合性骨折(6),并且随着软组织损伤程度的增加,感染率也会增加(7,8)。移位最小的骨折比移位的骨折更容易治疗(1)。因此,高能损伤增加了长骨,尤其是胫骨长骨骨折的数量和复杂性,因此解决了这些骨折的治疗方法。我们评估了使用Ilizarov装置作为这些骨折的稳定骨折的初始方式和确定方式。材料与方法从1999年至2004年,主要采用Ilizarov器械治疗了41例患者中的42例高能胫骨骨折(男37例,女4例)。主要的入选标准为Ⅲ度开放性和/或粉碎性胫骨骨折。排除标准包括低能骨折。 3C级开放性骨折,发现该器械在美学上不可接受的患者。平均年龄为39.1岁(范围为14-65岁)。道路交通事故占大多数(33)。其中3处是分段性骨折,1处是双侧骨折。四名患者有多处创伤。有闭合性骨折18处,开放性骨折24处。使用Gustilo和Anderson(8)分类,I级为4,II级为3,IIIA级为8,IIIB级为9。共有21例干meta端,17例干and端和3例干distal端骨折,所有病例均获得知情同意。用生理盐水大量冲洗所有开放性伤口,然后清除所有失活的骨骼和软组织。在急诊室开始抗生素治疗,对所有开放性骨折静脉给予头孢唑林,对Ⅲ级开放性骨折给予庆大霉素。在I型和II型伤口中给予抗生素3天,对III型伤口给予5天。在适当的情况下,尝试使用间断的尼龙缝合线进行无张力的初次闭合。如果无法实现安全的闭合,可通过动员相邻组织在骨头上动员,而不必进行额外的厚薄皮肤移植来使伤口的大小最小化。所有ⅢA级骨折均成功闭合,无伤口并发症。在IIIB级骨折中,可以成功地逼近2个伤口,其中4例需要腓肠肌皮瓣。两名IIIB级粉碎性骨折患者在伤口感染后受伤后期出现。原发灶彻底清除了所有失去生命的骨骼,软组织和受感染的材料

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号