...
首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Review Of The Results Of V – Nailing Vs Interlocking Nailing For Displaced Fractures Of Tibial Diaphysis In Adults.
【24h】

Review Of The Results Of V – Nailing Vs Interlocking Nailing For Displaced Fractures Of Tibial Diaphysis In Adults.

机译:成人胫骨干physi端移位性骨折的V型钉钉与V型钉钉互锁钉的结果的回顾。

获取原文
           

摘要

This study was conducted on 50 patients with closed and grade I compounded fractures of tibia who attended department of orthopaedics, Government Medical College Jammu, for a period of 2 years. Out of these, 25 patients were treated with interlocking nail and 25 were treated with primary intramedullary V-nailing. The patients were followed after every three weeks for three months; and six weekly till study was completed. The study shows that there is no significant difference in the results of V-nail and Interlocking nail so it is concluded that V-nail in places where C-arm is not available appeals to be an effective modality of treatment in unstable tibial diaphyseal fractures. Introduction Tibia is one of the largest and strongest bones of the body and one of the main weight bearing bone in the lower extremity. Its fracture may result in prolonged and extensive disability unless treatment is appropriate. This study was conducted on 50 patients with closed and grade I compounded fractures of tibia who attended department of orthopaedics, Government Medical College Jammu, for a period of 2 years. Out of these 25 patients were treated with interlocking nail and 25 were treated with primary intramedullary V-nailing. Aims and objectives To compare the result of V-nailing and interlocking nailing in the treatment of closed and type-1 compound fractures of shaft of tibia.To evaluate the complications of each modality of treatment. Materials and methods This study was conducted on 50 patients with closed and grade I compounded fractures of tibia who attended department of orthopaedics, Government Medical College Jammu, for a period of 2 years. Out of these 25 patients were treated with interlocking nail and 25 were treated with primary intramedullary V-nailing. Criteria for selection of patients Age: All the patients in the age group of 16 years and above with fresh fractures of tibial shaft were taken up for study.Type of fracture: Simple tibial fractures and type 1 compound fractures were included in the study.Radiologically all types were taken up.Fractures at least 3 inches from knee and ankle joint. Criteria for exclusion of patients The following fractures were excluded from the study:Compound fractures – type 2 and 3.Fractures in children.Pathological fractures.The patients after admission in the hospital were provided first aid treatment, splintage of the part and other necessary resuscitative measures. Detailed history, general physical examination, systemic and local examination was recorded. In case of compound fractures thorough wound debridement anddressing were done and broad spectrum antibiotics started after sending the material for culture and sensitivity. Interlocking The interlocking nailing was carried under general or spinal anaesthesia depending upon the choice of anaesthetist. The patient was placed supine on the normal operation table with knee flexed and affected leg hanging vertically down. An image intensifier was used to assess the reduction, to check the position of the guide wire and nail and for locking.The insertion point is slightly offset medially, slightly proximal to the tibial tuberosity and sufficiently below the tibial intercondylar area to avoid damage to the joint. The 6cm incision was made medial to the patellar ligament and the tendon was retracted 2cm laterally. The awl was used to open the thin cortex at the point of insertion. Guide wire was introduced into the medullary cavity and pushed into the distal fragment. The position of guide wire was confirmed with image intensifier. After reaming the medullary canal the nail was then inserted through the entry portal into medullary canal. Insertion was aided by gentle blows with hammer. Position of nail was checked with image intensifier. Postoperatively Quadriceps exercises, knee bending exercises and ankle movement were started soon after the patients were comfortable. Partial weight bearing and full weight bearing was started according to
机译:这项研究是针对50名患有闭合性和I级胫骨复合骨折的患者进行的,这些患者在查Jam政府医学院的骨科进行了为期2年的研究。在这些患者中,有25例接受了交锁钉治疗,而25例接受了一次髓内V钉治疗。每三周随访一次,持续三个月。每周六次,直到研究完成。研究表明,V型钉和互锁钉的结果没有显着差异,因此得出的结论是,在没有C型臂的地方,V型钉是治疗不稳定型胫骨干骨骨折的一种有效方式。简介胫骨是人体最大,最坚固的骨骼之一,也是下肢的主要负重骨骼之一。除非适当治疗,否则其骨折可能导致长期和广泛的残疾。这项研究是针对50名患有闭合性和I级胫骨复合骨折的患者进行的,这些患者在查Jam政府医学院的骨科进行了为期2年的研究。在这25例患者中,采用互锁钉治疗,其中25例采用原发性髓内V钉治疗。目的与目的比较V钉和交锁钉在胫骨干闭合性骨折和1型复合骨折中的治疗效果。评估每种治疗方式的并发症。材料和方法这项研究是针对50名患有闭合性和I级胫骨复合骨折的患者进行的,这些患者曾在查Jam政府医学院的骨科进修2年。在这25例患者中,采用互锁钉治疗,其中25例采用原发性髓内V钉治疗。选择患者的标准年龄:年龄在16岁及以上的所有胫骨干新鲜骨折的患者均接受研究。骨折类型:本研究包括简单的胫骨骨折和1型复合骨折。所有类型的伤口均已收起。骨折距离膝盖和踝关节至少3英寸。排除患者的标准本研究排除了以下骨折:复合性骨折-2型和3型儿童骨折。病理性骨折。入院后的患者接受了急救治疗,部件sp突和其他必要的复苏措施措施。记录详细病史,一般体格检查,全身和局部检查。如果发生复合性骨折,则应进行彻底的伤口清创和处理,并在将材料用于培养和敏感性后开始使用广谱抗生素。联锁联锁钉在全麻或脊椎麻醉下进行,具体取决于麻醉师的选择。病人仰卧在正常手术台上,膝盖弯曲,患肢垂直垂下。使用图像增强器评估缩小程度,检查导丝和钉子的位置并进行锁定。插入点向内稍微偏移,稍微靠近胫骨结节并充分位于胫骨inter间区域以下,以免损坏联合。在the骨韧带内侧切开6cm的切口,将肌腱向外侧缩回2cm。用锥子在插入点打开薄皮层。将导丝引入髓腔并推入远端碎片。用图像增强器确认导丝的位置。扩髓髓管后,将指甲通过进入口插入髓管。用锤子轻轻敲打有助于插入。用图像增强器检查指甲的位置。患者感到舒适后不久就开始了股四头肌锻炼,膝盖弯曲锻炼和踝关节运动。根据

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号