首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >The Twig-Brook Lesion In Barefoot Waders; A Common But Neglected Injury In The Foot
【24h】

The Twig-Brook Lesion In Barefoot Waders; A Common But Neglected Injury In The Foot

机译:赤脚涉水者的嫩枝布鲁克病;脚部常见但被忽视的伤害

获取原文
           

摘要

Penetrating injuries of the foot are very common. Although apparently straightforward, delayed diagnosis, inappropriate approach and treatment can lead to complications and unsatisfactory results. We present our diagnostic and therapeutic approach using an outcomes approach and clinical results in a commonly seen lesion in our state which occurs due to the penetration of wooden twigs or splinters while wading barefoot through small streams or brooks which we have named the twig-brook lesion. Introduction Penetrating foot injuries of all types are very common. There are some types of such injuries that are typical of a certain region due to certain local factors like barefoot walking, farming, presence of certain animals or parasites and hygiene etc. A classical penetrating injury seen in this part of Southeast Asia occurs when people wade barefoot through shallow streams or brooks and cannot discern if any sharp objecct is present beneath their feet till they feel a twinge of pain. Usually, the person comes out of the water and examines the foot to find a small wound on the plantar aspect of the foot with some blood oozing out of it. The woung is generally dismissed as minor and ascribed to some sharp stone present in the stream and not attended to. However, the wound is persistent and does not heal even after the patient seeks medical attention, usually from the local medical shop. The patient usually seeks specialised attention only after 2-3 months have passed and there is a sinus formation with occasional pus discharge. Radiography is unhelpful and exploration of the wound done under torniquet control invariably reveals a wooden twig or splinter which is surrounded by necrotic tissue and pus which forms a pathway till the sinus opening. Removal of the foreign body with meticulous debridement and healing of the wound by secondary intention resolves the lesion. Materials and Methods Between 2005 and 2009, 67 patients (47 M and 20 F; mean age- 28, range 8 to 53; follow-up: mean 2.5Y range of follow-up 2–4 years) were treated for neglected penetrating foot injury following barefoot wading in shallow brooks. The patients presented with plantar wounds which were not healing and sinus formation with intermittent pus discharge. The duration of injury ranged from 3 weeks to 15 weeks with an average of 7 weeks. Each patient had a routine x-ray of the foot but sonography was not done as it was not available in our setup. The patients were operated under regional or general anesthesia and torniquet control. Postopertively, the patients were kept on systemic antibiotics for 5 days. Results The presence of a foreign body inside the foot tissues was detected in 63/67 patients (94%) and they were operated upon by meticulous debridement and removal of foreign body(FB). In the remaining 4 patients we could not trace any sizable FB but we could remove organic debris and traces of bark. Complete healing was observed in 64/67 (95%) of patients, although 6 /67 (9%) underwent secondary debridement. There were no bony pathologies and the infective pathology was confined to the soft tissues only.
机译:脚的穿透伤很常见。尽管明显地直接,延迟的诊断,不适当的方法和治疗可能导致并发症和不令人满意的结果。我们使用一种结局方法和临床结果来介绍我们的诊断和治疗方法,该状态在我们的状态下很常见,这是由于木小树枝或碎片穿过小溪或小溪赤脚涉水而导致的,我们将其称为小枝小溪病变。简介穿透脚的所有类型的伤害都很常见。由于某些当地因素,例如赤脚行走,耕种,某些动物或寄生虫的存在以及卫生状况等,某些类型的伤害是某些地区的典型伤害。当人们涉水时,会在东南亚这部分地区发生典型的穿透性伤害。赤脚穿过浅水小溪或溪流,直到他们感到一阵痛苦之后,才能分辨脚下是否存在任何尖锐的物体。通常,该人从水中出来,检查脚以发现脚底面有一个小伤口,其中渗出了一些血液。 woung通常被认为是次要的,被认为是溪流中存在的一些尖锐的石头,没有有人照看。但是,伤口是持久性的,即使患者通常在当地的医疗店寻求医疗救助后也无法愈合。通常仅在2-3个月过去之后,患者才会寻求专门的护理,并且有鼻窦形成,偶尔有脓液排出。放射线检查无济于事,在气门镜控制下进行的伤口探查总是显示出木质的树枝或碎片,其周围有坏死组织和脓液,形成了直至窦开放的通路。进行细致的清创术清除异物,并通过继发性意图治愈伤口,从而使病变消退。材料和方法2005年至2009年间,对67例被忽略的穿透性足患者进行了治疗(47 M和20 F;平均年龄28岁,范围8至53;随访:平均2.5年随访2–4年)。赤脚涉足浅溪后受伤。患者出现plant骨伤口,伤口愈合不全,鼻窦有间歇性脓液排出。受伤持续时间从3周到15周不等,平均为7周。每个患者都有常规的脚部X射线检查,但由于我们的设置无法提供超声检查,因此未进行超声检查。患者在区域或全身麻醉和气门静脉控制下进行手术。术后,患者使用全身抗生素治疗5天。结果63/67例患者(94%)发现足部组织内有异物,并对其进行了细致的清创术并清除了异物(FB)。在其余4例患者中,我们无法发现任何较大的FB,但可以去除有机物碎片和树皮的痕迹。尽管有6/67(9%)进行了第二次清创术,但在64/67(95%)的患者中观察到完全愈合。没有骨性病变,感染性病变仅局限于软组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号