首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting: Prospective Study Of Various Techniques And Donor Site Morbidity
【24h】

Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting: Prospective Study Of Various Techniques And Donor Site Morbidity

机译:lia骨骨移植的收获:各种技术和供体部位发病率的前瞻性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background - Harvesting autograft bone from the ilium is not without complications. When cases are reported in follow-ups, investigators usually concentrate upon treatment outcome of the principle problems and not on the donor site morbidity from harvesting a bone graft. The purpose of our study is to assess the complications related to bone grafting site of iliac crest, simultaneously evaluation and assessment of various techniques used for harvesting the bone graft from the iliac crest. Material and methods - 56 patients were included in our study, which fulfilled the criteria of at least 6 months follow up. Bone graft was harvested from anterior or posterior iliac crest by wolfe-kawamoto’s, outer cortex, inner cortex and tricortical graft harvesting and trephine techniques. Results – Graft harvested from anterior crest in 49 cases (88%), posterior crest in 6 cases (11%) and bilateral anterior crest in 1 (1.8%). Graft harvesting techniques- wolfe-kaamoto’s used in 15(27%), outer cortex in 30 patients (55%), inner cortex in 1(1.8%), and tricortical in 8(14%) and trephine method in 1(1.8%) patient. Average amount of graft harvested from posterior cortex was more compared to anterior crest (13.3/9.6 gm). Donor site complications- infection rate 7.2% (superficial- 3 patients, deep- 1 patient), hematoma 1.8% (n-1), cutaneous nerve injury 14.3% (temporary loss of sensation 3, residual loss in 5 patients), donor site pain 10.6% (temporary- 5, residual- 1) and direct incomplete hernia in 1 patient (1.8%). Total donor site morbidity was (35.6%)[minor complications in 21.4%(n-12) and major complications in 14.2%(n-8)]. Conclusion- Harvesting bone graft from iliac crest is not without complications. Injury to the cutaneous nerve around the crest constitutes the major component of morbidity after iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Introduction The principles, indications and techniques of bone grafting were well established before “ the metallurgic age” of orthopedic surgery. Church literature presented the first mention of bone transplantation in 1682. The first successful autograft was reported by Dr. P. Von Walther in 1820 and Macewen, 58 years later using an aseptic technique performed the first successful autograft bone transplant. Anterior and posterior iliac crest are good sources of large cancellous and cortico-cancellous graft. If the patient is prone, posterior third of ilium is used, if supine, the anterior third is available. There are various methods of graft harvesting from iliac crest- graft from outer cortex, graft from inner cortex, wolfe-kawamoto’s method, tricortical graft, “trap-door” technique, “table-splitting” method and trephine technique1, 5. Many studies reporting on the morbidity of the iliac crest bone graft have reported overall complications ranging from 15% to 49%3,4. Complications that have been enlisted are infection, hernia, fracture, pelvic instability, nerve injury, ureteral injury, chronic pain, hematoma, gait abnormality, superior gluteal artery injury and enterocutaneous fistula2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Complications at donor site can be divided into minor and major, definition, which has been provided, by Younger and Chapman12. Minor complications were defined as self-limited events that did not require an additional surgical procedure and responded to non-operative management. Major complications were those that led prolonged hospitalization and required additional surgery. The purpose of our study is to assess the complications related to bone grafting site of iliac crest, simultaneously evaluation and assessment of various techniques used for harvesting the bone graft from the iliac crest. Material and Methds 56 patients who had undergone iliac crest bone graft harvesting between September2003-September2004 were studied retrospectively. There were 50 females and 6 males, most of the patients were between 20-30 age group (n-22). Most common indication for iliac crest bone graft harvesting was fresh
机译:背景-从the骨中收集自体骨并非没有并发症。当在后续病例中报告病例时,研究人员通常将注意力集中在主要问题的治疗结果上,而不是集中在收获骨移植物的供体部位发病率上。我们的研究目的是评估与骨植骨部位相关的并发症,同时评估和评估用于从rest骨中获取植骨的各种技术。材料和方法-我们的研究包括56名患者,这些患者符合至少6个月随访的标准。通过Wolfe-kawamoto's,外皮层,内皮层和三皮层移植物的收集和tr环技术,从terior前或后harvest中收获骨移植物。结果–从前c获得的移植物49例(88%),后,6例(11%),双侧前and 1例(1.8%)。移植物采集技术-使用Wolfe-Kaamoto's的占15%(27%),使用30位患者的外皮层(55%),使用内部皮质的占1%(1.8%),使用三层皮质的占8%(14%),使用曲啡方法占1%(1.8%) )病人。从后皮层收获的移植物的平均数量要比前冠高(13.3 / 9.6 gm)。供体部位并发症-感染率7.2%(浅表3例,深层1例),血肿1.8%(n-1),皮肤神经损伤14.3%(感觉暂时性丧失3,5例残余丧失),供体部位疼痛10.6%(暂时5-残留1)和直接不完全疝1例(1.8%)。供体总发病率(35.6%)[次要并发症为21.4%(n-12),主要并发症为14.2%(n-8)]。结论-从骨收获骨移植物并非没有并发症。周围的皮肤神经损伤是harvest骨植骨收获后发病的主要组成部分。引言在骨科手术的“冶金时代”之前,已经很好地确立了植骨的原理,适应症和技术。教会文献在1682年首次提及了骨移植。P。Von Walther博士于1820年报道了首次成功的自体移植,而58年后,Macewen用无菌技术进行了首次成功的自体骨移植。前和后are是大型松质和皮质-松质移植物的良好来源。如果患者俯卧,则使用i骨的后三分之一,如果仰卧,则可使用前三分之一。从骨移植到外皮移植,从内皮层移植,沃尔夫-河本法,三皮层移植,“陷门”技术,“桌子分裂”方法和曲华碱技术有很多方法1、5。关于the骨植骨发病率的报道,其总体并发症范围为15%至49%3,4。已引起的并发症包括感染,疝气,骨折,骨盆不稳,神经损伤,输尿管损伤,慢性疼痛,血肿,步态异常,臀上动脉损伤和肠胃镜瘘2、4、5、6、7、8、9、10 ,11。 Younger和Chapman [12]已将供体部位的并发症分为次要和主要定义。轻度并发症定义为自我限制事件,不需要额外的手术程序并且对非手术治疗有反应。主要并发症是导致长期住院和需要额外手术的并发症。我们的研究目的是评估与骨植骨部位相关的并发症,同时评估和评估用于从rest骨中获取植骨的各种技术。材料和方法回顾性分析了2003年9月至2004年9月间接受骨骨移植的56例患者。女性50例,男性6例,大多数患者在20-30岁之间(n-22)。骨移植的最常见适应症是新鲜的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号