首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Nursing Sciences >Pelvic floor muscle training as a persistent nursing intervention: Effect on delivery outcome and pelvic floor myodynamia
【24h】

Pelvic floor muscle training as a persistent nursing intervention: Effect on delivery outcome and pelvic floor myodynamia

机译:骨盆底肌肉训练作为持续的护理干预措施:对分娩结局和骨盆底肌痛的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training as a nursing intervention on delivery outcomes and postpartum pelvic floor myodynamia.MethodsIn total, 106 nulliparas were randomised into an intervention group and control group. All nulliparas participated in a pelvic floor training programme led by a midwife. A pelvic floor physical therapist measured the women's pelvic floor myodynamia and taught them how to correctly perform pelvic muscle contractions before the intervention. A registered nurse monitored the intervention group via twice-weekly telephone checkups. The control group did not receive individual direction.ResultsThere were no differences in the rate of Caesarean section or elective Caesarean section between the two groups (χ2?=?3.446,p?=?0.076 andχ2?=?2.343,p?=?0.185, respectively). There was a difference in the timing of the second stage of labour between the two groups (t?=?2.101,p?=?0.040); no difference was observed in the timing of the other two stages of labour (t?=?1.771,p?=?0.081 andt?=?1.142,p?=?0.263, respectively). In addition, no differences were observed in the gestational weight gain (t?=?0.196,p?=?0.845), neonatal weight (t?=?0.113,p?=?0.911), rate of episiotomy (χ2?=?0.932,p?=?0.351) or rate of perineal laceration (χ2?=?0.022,p?=?0.982) between the two groups. The pelvic floor myodynamia of the intervention group had improved to a greater degree than that in the control group at 6 weeks and 3 months after delivery (p?
机译:目的评估骨盆底肌肉训练作为分娩结局和产后骨盆底肌痛的护理干预措施的效果。方法将106例原产妇随机分为干预组和对照组。所有nulliparas参加了由助产士领导的骨盆底训练计划。骨盆底物理治疗师测量了妇女的骨盆底肌力障碍,并教他们如何在干预前正确进行骨盆肌肉收缩。注册护士通过每周两次电话检查来监视干预组。结果两组之间的剖宫产率和选择性剖宫产率无差异(χ2≥3.446,p≥0.076,χ2≥2.343,p≥0.185)。 , 分别)。两组之间第二产程的时间有所不同(t == 2.101,p == 0.040)。在其他两个分娩阶段的时间上没有观察到差异(分别为t 1 = 1.771,p 2 = 0.081和t 1 = 1.142,p 2 = 0.263)。另外,在妊娠期体重增加(t 2 = 0.196,p 2 = 0.845),新生儿体重(t 3 = 0.113,p 2 = 0.911),会阴切开率(χ2 = 3∶1)方面没有差异。两组之间的会阴撕裂发生率(χ2= 0.932,≥0.932,p?= 0.351)或?分娩后6周和3个月,干预组的骨盆底肌痛改善程度比对照组大(p <0.005)。结论孕妇/产后妇女的持续护理干预有助于缩短第二阶段劳动和促进产后骨盆底肌力障碍的恢复。这种干预对分娩方式以及会阴切开和会阴撕裂的发生率的影响仍然未知。医务人员应加强涉及骨盆底功能康复的健康教育计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号