首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning >Evaluation of Intelligent Grouping Based on Learners’ Collaboration Competence Level in Online Collaborative Learning Environment
【24h】

Evaluation of Intelligent Grouping Based on Learners’ Collaboration Competence Level in Online Collaborative Learning Environment

机译:在线协作学习环境中基于学习者协作能力水平的智能分组评价

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper we explore the impact of an intelligent grouping algorithm based on learners’ collaborative competency when compared with (a) instructor based Grade Point Average (GPA) method level and (b) random method, on group outcomes and group collaboration problems in an online collaborative learning environment.? An intelligent grouping algorithm has been added in a Learning Management System (LMS) which is capable of forming heterogeneous groups based on learners’ collaborative competency level. True experiment design methodology was deployed to examine whether there is any association between group formation method and group scores, learning experiences and group problems. ?From the findings, all groups had almost similar mean scores in all group tests, and shared many similar group collaboration problems and learning experiences. However, with the understanding that GPA group formation method involves the instructor, may not be dynamic, and the random method does not guarantee heterogeneity based on learner’s collaboration competence level, instructors are more likely to adopt our intelligent grouping method as the findings show that it has similar results. Furthermore, it provides an added advantage in supporting group formation due to its guarantee on heterogeneity, dynamism, and less instructor involvement.
机译:在本文中,我们探讨了基于学习者协作能力的智能分组算法与(a)基于讲师的平均绩点(GPA)方法水平和(b)随机方法相比,对小组成绩和小组协作问题的影响。在线协作学习环境。在学习管理系统(LMS)中添加了智能分组算法,该算法能够根据学习者的协作能力水平来形成异构组。部署了真实的实验设计方法论来检查小组形成方法与小组得分,学习经历和小组问题之间是否存在任何关联。从调查结果看,所有小组在所有小组测验中的平均得分几乎都相似,并且共享许多相似的小组协作问题和学习经验。但是,由于了解到GPA分组的形成方法涉及教师,可能不是动态的,并且随机方法不能保证基于学习者协作能力水平的异质性,因此教师更有可能采用我们的智能分组方法,因为调查结果表明,有相似的结果。此外,由于其对异质性,动态性和较少的教师参与的保证,它在支持团体形成方面提供了额外的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号