首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research >A STUDY TO EVALUATE USAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AT PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRES AND URBAN HEALTH CENTRES IN AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
【24h】

A STUDY TO EVALUATE USAGE OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AT PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRES AND URBAN HEALTH CENTRES IN AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

机译:艾哈迈达巴德地区初级卫生中心和城市卫生中心抗菌剂使用评价研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the use and the impact of interventions on the use of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) at Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Urban Health Centres (UHCs) in Ahmedabad district. Materials and methods: This was an interventional and prospective study carried out at 5 PHCs and 5 UHCs of ahmedabad district. In pre-intervention phase, 30 adult patients from each centre who were prescribed AMAs were included. Educational interventions were done for the prescribers by giving them booklet and by PowerPoint presentation about the use of AMAs for common diseases observed in the pre-intervention phase. In post-intervention phase, similar to pre-intervention phase, 30 adult patients from each centre i.e. 5 PHCs and 5 UHCs who were prescribed AMA were included. The impact of intervention and appropriateness of AMA use was measured using Modified Kunin’s Criteria. Results: Amongst a total of 300 patients, i.e. 150 each from PHCs and UHCs, the most commonly AMAs used were metronidazole and doxycycline respectively in pre-intervention phase. According to modified Kunin’s criteria, appropriate antimicrobial treatment was given to only 12% patients at PHCs and 6.67% patients at UHCs in pre-intervention phase. In the post-intervention phase (n=300) the most commonly used AMAs were same as in pre-intervention phase. Appropriate antimicrobial treatment according to modified Kunin’s criteria was given to 20% patients at PHCs and 9.33% patients at UHCs in post-intervention phase. Conclusion: AMAs were not appropriately prescribed at PHCs and UHCs according to modified Kunin’s criteria, but educational intervention improved it but not significantly.
机译:目的和目标:在艾哈迈达巴德地区的初级卫生中心(PHC)和城市卫生中心(UHC)中评估干预措施对使用抗菌剂(AMA)的使用及其影响。材料和方法:这是对艾哈迈达巴德地区的5个初级卫生保健中心和5个UHC进行的一项干预性和前瞻性研究。在干预前阶段,纳入了每个中心接受处方AMA的30名成年患者。通过向开处方者提供小册子和PowerPoint演示文稿,对他们进行教育干预,以介绍他们在干预前阶段对常见疾病使用AMA的情况。在干预后阶段,与干预前阶段相似,每个中心有30名成年患者,即5个PHC和5个UAMA处方了AMA。干预的影响和使用AMA的适当性是根据改良的Kunin标准评估的。结果:在总共300例患者中,即来自初级保健中心和UHC的150例患者,在干预前阶段最常用的AMA分别是甲硝唑和强力霉素。根据改良的Kunin标准,在干预前阶段,仅对12%的PHC患者和6.67%的UHC患者进行了适当的抗菌治疗。在干预后阶段(n = 300),最常用的AMA与干预前阶段相同。在干预后阶段,根据改良的库宁标准,对20%的初级保健患者和9.33%的UHC患者进行了适当的抗菌治疗。结论:根据经修改的库宁标准,在初级保健中心和超高等保健中心没有适当地开办AMA,但是教育干预对此有所改善,但效果并不明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号