...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review
【24h】

Use of mHealth for promoting healthy ageing and supporting delivery of age-friendly care services: a systematic review

机译:使用mHealth促进健康的衰老并支持提供对老年友好的护理服务:系统的审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction :The proportion of people aged over 60 years is increasing globally and expected to double by 2050 [1]. The World Health Organization and health systems globally have identified mobile health (mHealth) as an important strategy to address the health needs of this growing population group. Healthcare innovations focused on ageing, including mHealth interventions, provide an opportunity to enhance service delivery. A systematic review [2] was undertaken to answer the following questions: 1. How is mHealth being used to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services? 2. What are the effective models for implementing mHealth interventions? 3. What are the lessons learnt from implementation of mHealth initiatives? 4. Is there enough evidence to support the impact of mHealth interventions? Methods :The review was conducted in late 2017, following the PRISMA[3] guidelines for systematic reviews. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched.A combination of the terms ‘mHealth OR mobile health’ AND 'healthy ageing’ AND 'aged care’ was used along with the five domains of the RE-AIM framework [4]. The inclusion criteria were: (i) literature published from 2007 to 2017 on mHealth interventions, and (ii) mHealth interventions conducted on people aged 45 years and older. Results :Of 2883 records identified, 133 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most mHealth interventions were an adjunct to existing age-friendly health services, particularly for older adults with chronic health conditions. There were no examples of scaled-up implementations or systematic evaluations of successful feasibility and usability studies that implemented mHealth.The rapid pace of technological change as well as development, adoption and demise of mHealth apps presents crucial challenges for consumers, health care providers and policy makers. Overall, there is a lack of conclusive evidence regarding cost-effectiveness of mHealth to improve healthy ageing and support age-friendly health services. Implications for policy, practice and research: Future mHealth research needs robust experimental designs and a person-centred, biopsychosocial approach that looks at multi-level determinants of health care. Collaborative partnerships for the design, development, testing, implementation and evaluation of mHealth apps are essential.Robust governance frameworks for mHealth strategies are also required, as there is a risk the mHealth initiatives will further fragment care due to development and use of too many disparate apps and platforms without shared data frameworks or governance. References : 1. World Health Organization (2016). World report on ageing and health 2015. 2. Liaw ST, Ansari S, Jonnagaddala J, Narasimhan P, Ashraf MM, Harris-Roxas B and Harris M (2017). A systematic review of the use of mHealth to promote healthy ageing and support the delivery of age-friendly health and long-term care services. PROSPERO CRD42017082383. 3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG and Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 6(7):e1000097. 4. Gaglio B, Shoup JA and Glasgow RE (2013). The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time. American Journal of Public Health. 103(6):e38-e46.
机译:简介:全球60岁以上的人口比例正在增加,预计到2050年将翻一番[1]。世界卫生组织和全球卫生系统已将移动医疗(mHealth)确定为解决这一不断增长的人口群体的健康需求的重要战略。专注于老龄化的医疗保健创新(包括移动医疗保健干预措施)提供了增强服务交付的机会。进行了系统评价[2],以回答以下问题:1.如何利用mHealth促进健康老龄化并支持提供对老年人友好的健康和长期护理服务? 2.实施移动健康干预的有效模式是什么? 3.从实施移动健康倡议中汲取的教训是什么? 4.是否有足够的证据支持移动健康干预的影响?方法:按照PRISMA [3]的系统评价指南,该评价于2017年末进行。搜索MEDLINE,EMBASE,Global Health,PsycINFO,Scopus,ScienceDirect,CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆,并结合使用了``mHealth或移动医疗'',``健康老龄化''和``老年护理''等术语以及以下五个领域RE-AIM框架[4]。纳入标准为:(i)2007年至2017年发表的有关mHealth干预措施的文献,以及(ii)针对45岁及45岁以上人群进行的mHealth干预措施。结果:鉴定的2883个记录中,有133个研究被纳入定性综合。大多数mHealth干预措施都是现有的老年友好型医疗服务的辅助手段,特别是对于患有慢性疾病的老年人。尚无扩大实施mHealth的成功实施可行性或可用性研究的规模化实施或系统评估的示例。技术变革的快速步伐以及mHealth应用的开发,采用和淘汰对消费者,医疗保健提供者和政策提出了严峻挑战制造商。总体而言,缺乏关于mHealth改善健康老龄化和支持对老年人友好的医疗服务的成本效益的确凿证据。对政策,实践和研究的影响:未来的mHealth研究需要可靠的实验设计和以人为中心的生物心理社会方法来研究卫生保健的多层次决定因素。设计,开发,测试,实施和评估mHealth应用程序的合作伙伴关系至关重要。还需要针对mHealth策略的稳健治理框架,因为由于开发和使用过多不同的mHealth举措可能会进一步分散护理服务的风险没有共享数据框架或治理的应用程序和平台。参考文献:1.世界卫生组织(2016年)。 2015年世界老龄化与健康报告。2. Liaw ST,Ansari S,Jonnagaddala J,Narasimhan P,Ashraf MM,Harris-Roxas B和Harris M(2017年)。对使用mHealth促进健康老龄化并支持提供对老年人友好的健康和长期护理服务的系统评价。 PROSPERO CRD42017082383。 3. Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,Altman DG和Group P(2009)。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。 PLoS药物。 6(7):e1000097。 4. Gaglio B,Shoup JA和Glasgow RE(2013)。 RE-AIM框架:随着时间的推移对使用情况的系统评价。美国公共卫生杂志。 103(6):e38-e46。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号