首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Evaluating integrated social care by utilizing regional resources in Japan
【24h】

Evaluating integrated social care by utilizing regional resources in Japan

机译:利用日本的地区资源评估综合社会护理

获取原文
           

摘要

Background : The Japanese government has recently promoted a communitybased integrated care system, and the new reform of the system implemented in 2012 will reinforce this integration of care. In Japan, social security expenditures are increasing along with the increasing elderly population ratio? therefore, it is important to promote the utilization of existing regional resources to reduce longterm care provision costs. In each regional community, a variety of organizations and groups provide a range of functions in the lives of local residents, from providing small bits of information such as health promotion to great undertakings such as the reconstruction of the local community. Regional centers and the local social welfare councils are representative organizations that offer seamless support services in cities, towns, and villages throughout the country in the country as representative organizations by integrating regional resource information into these support services. Regional resources are not necessarily limited to information concerning social care activities for the elderly, and this means care is provided in the broadest sense. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of the actual conditions and the intensity of integration between regional centers and regional resources for nationwide social care provision. Methods : A selfcompleted survey was administered at 4,557 Community-based integrated Centres [CBICs] regional centers and 1,741 social welfare councils [SWCs] in Japan. The purpose of this survey was to gain an understanding of the actual conditions of these centers and how they collect, manage, and use their regional resources for the benefit of all. We used 5 degrees of the “functional clinical integration scale” developed by Ahgren (2005) to evaluate integration intensity. Results : 1. The recovery rates for the CBICs and SWCs were 31.5% (1,437/4,557) and 43.4% (808/1,741), respectively. 2. Regarding the intensity of integration, the top three regional resources of the CBICs were Case worker/children’s social workers’ council, 3.41? Communal organizations, 2.41? and Fundamental organizations for regional welfare promotion, 2.38. Those of the SWCs were Case worker/children’s social workers’ council, 3.92? Volunteer group, 3.32? and Communal organizations, 2.95. 3. The scores for the different categories of regional resources used by the CBICs in providing social care were: Watching over, 3.03? Salon and intercommunication, 2.71? and Fitness, 2.54. Those of the resources used by the SWCs and the regional resources were Urban renovation, 4.38? Salon and intercommunication4.21? and Watching over, 3.65. Conclusions and Discussion : This study is the first to reveal on a national scale the main uses of regional resources for social care provision at two types of regional centers in Japan. In order to structure the CommunityBased Integrated Care System and improve the quality of seamless care in the communities, it is critical to strategically use the regional resources existing in each local community to provide social care for the people who need it. Therefore, it is necessary to continually update information concerning regional resources and build a system to effectively use this information. This research is supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), # 15dk0107014h0002.
机译:背景:日本政府最近推动​​了基于社区的综合护理系统,2012年实施的新系统改革将加强这种护理整合。在日本,社会保障支出随着老年人口比例的增加而增加?因此,重要的是促进利用现有区域资源以减少长期护理服务成本。在每个区域社区中,各种各样的组织和团体在当地居民的生活中提供一系列功能,从提供少量信息(例如健康促进)到伟大事业(例如重建当地社区)。区域中心和地方社会福利委员会是代表组织,通过将区域资源信息整合到这些支持服务中,在全国各地的城市,城镇和村庄中提供无缝支持服务。区域资源不一定限于有关老年人社会护理活动的信息,这意味着从最广泛的意义上讲就是提供护理。目的:本研究的目的是了解全国范围内提供全国社会护理的地区中心与地区资源之间的实际状况和整合强度。方法:在日本的4,557个基于社区的综合中心[CBIC]区域中心和1,741个社会福利委员会[SWC]进行了一项自我完成的调查。这项调查的目的是了解这些中心的实际状况,以及它们如何收集,管理和使用其区域资源以造福所有人。我们使用Ahgren(2005)开发的“功能临床整合量表”的5度来评估整合强度。结果:1. CBIC和SWC的回收率分别为31.5%(1,437 / 4,557)和43.4%(808 / 1,741)。 2.关于整合的强度,CBIC的前三大区域资源是案例工作者/儿童社会工作者理事会,为3.41?社区组织,2.41?和促进地区福利的基本组织,2.38。那些SWC是案例工作者/儿童社会工作者委员会,3.92?义工小组3.32?和社区组织,2.95。 3. CBIC在提供社会护理方面使用的不同类别区域资源的得分为:监视3.03?沙龙和内部交流2.71?和健身,2.54。主权财富基金使用的资源和区域资源是城市改造,4.38?沙龙和内部交流4.21?和监视,3.65。结论与讨论:这项研究是首次在全国范围内揭示日本在两种类型的区域中心提供社会服务的区域资源的主要用途。为了构建基于社区的综合护理系统并提高社区中无缝护理的质量,至关重要的是战略性地利用每个本地社区中现有的区域资源为需要它的人们提供社会护理。因此,有必要不断更新有关区域资源的信息,并建立一个有效利用该信息的系统。这项研究得到了日本医学研究与发展局(AMED)的支持,编号15dk0107014h0002。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号