首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Supports and hindrances to the integration of co-located services in multiple models of primary health care delivery Integration in co-located primary health care services
【24h】

Supports and hindrances to the integration of co-located services in multiple models of primary health care delivery Integration in co-located primary health care services

机译:支持和阻碍在多种模式的初级卫生保健提供中整合托管服务在集成化初级保健服务中整合

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction : In 2008 the Australian Government funded the establishment of GP Super Clinics based loosely on the UK Darzi polyclinic model. The intention was to collocate general practice and allied health services. The initiative was centred in primary care and integration between primary care and specialist medical or hospital services was not a prime objective. No specific model for how integration was to be achieved was mandated. This study is an evaluation integration of six GP Super Clinics in South Australia and Victoria funded by the Australian Primary Care Research Institute conducted between 2014-5. Methods : The design was a multiple case study (mixed methods design). Quantitative data was collected using three surveys (clinic manager survey, health professional survey, patient survey) and qualitative data from patient and health professional focus groups. Each collection tool was applied concurrently at each case study site. Survey tools were administered first, sample GP management plans collected, and then focus groups conducted. Explanatory sequential process was used as the basis for data analysis (quantitative data then qualitative data to explain findings). A case study database was established to collate information collected for each site. Each case study site was described in terms of the seven components (for example, level of variety of services co-located, level of internal service integration mechanisms). Quantitative survey data was manually coded, entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and imported into SPSS for analysis. Frequencies, means, standard deviation and range, as well as cross-tabulations with percentages were calculated. Results : There was mixed evidence that the health clinics were aligning their services to match surrounding community demand with only two centres basing their decisions on service development on local research. All clinics started with a core set of services that expanded over time usually starting with at least GPs. In Australia, all GP pathology, radiology, specialist services and some allied health services have a Medicare funded rebate. While often there was no out-of-pocket expense to clinic patients access for some services or for patients not considered disadvantaged required a ‘gap’ payment. This impact on access to comprehensive care for some patients The clinics had similar ways of reimbursing health care professionals but there was some variation for allied health professionals. Nurses were most commonly salaried across all organizations and the State funded clinics were able to provide allied health free to patients by having the resources to pay staff a salary. Patients and practitioners felt the collocation improved patient convenience and satisfaction. Practitioners identified a lack of formal integrated care structures. The important role of nurses working in these clinics at integrating care between other health professionals was identified. Patients participating in the focus groups sensed that integration was not occurring in the clinics. Conclusions : When contemplating integration health professionals focused on communication, trust, familiarity and the importance of process in defining if it could be successful. Integration tended to be understood in terms of sharing of information about an approach to treatment, treatment proposed for the patient and not about how treatment was delivered. Patients perceived an absence of communication and information sharing among health professionals. Lessons learned : Health professionals are the drivers of integrated care. There were low rates of integrated care across all health service models in our study. Currently there are few incentives to achieve integrated care in Australia Limitations : Limited resource study examining only 6 of the 64 funded clinics in a limited geographical area. Data coded by only one researcher. Suggestions for future research : To what extent have resources and infrastructural supports been concertedly reviewed for their facilitation or obstruction to integration within different co-located PHC models within GP Super Clinics?.
机译:简介:2008年,澳大利亚政府根据英国Darzi综合诊所模式,资助建立了GP超级诊所。目的是将一般做法和相关的卫生服务并置在一起。该倡议以初级保健为中心,初级保健与专科医疗或医院服务之间的整合并不是主要目标。没有规定如何实现集成的特定模型。这项研究是对由澳大利亚初级保健研究院于2014-5年间资助的南澳大利亚州和维多利亚州的六个GP超级诊所进行的评估整合。方法:该设计为多案例研究(混合方法设计)。使用三项调查(诊所经理调查,卫生专业人员调查,患者调查)以及来自患者和卫生专业人员焦点小组的定性数据收集定量数据。每个案例研究站点同时应用了每个收集工具。首先管理调查工具,收集样本GP管理计划,然后进行焦点小组讨论。解释性顺序过程被用作数据分析的基础(定量数据然后是定性数据以解释发现)。建立了一个案例研究数据库来整理每个站点收集的信息。每个案例研究站点都由七个组成部分描述(例如,共置的各种服务级别,内部服务集成机制级别)。定量调查数据经过手动编码,输入到Microsoft Excel电子表格中,然后导入SPSS中进行分析。计算频率,均值,标准差和范围以及带有百分比的交叉列表。结果:有混合的证据表明,只有两个中心根据当地研究的服务开发决策,使卫生诊所调整其服务以适应周围社区的需求。所有诊所都从一组核心服务开始,这些服务随着时间的流逝而扩展,通常至少从全科医生开始。在澳大利亚,所有全科医生的病理学,放射学,专科服务以及一些相关的健康服务都有由Medicare资助的回扣。通常情况下,门诊患者获得某些服务或没有被视为弱势的患者都需要自费支付“缺口”款项。这对某些患者获得全面护理的影响诊所向医护人员报销费用的方式类似,但是专职医护人员的费用有所不同。在所有组织中,护士的薪水通常最高,而国家资助的诊所可以通过资源支付员工薪水,免费为患者提供专职医疗服务。患者和医生认为,这种搭配改善了患者的便利性和满意度。从业人员发现缺乏正式的综合护理结构。确定了在这些诊所工作的护士在整合其他卫生专业人员之间的护理方面的重要作用。参加焦点小组的患者感觉到诊所没有发生融合。结论:在考虑整合时,卫生专业人员将重点放在沟通,信任,熟悉程度以及过程在定义是否成功上的重要性上。人们倾向于通过共享有关治疗方法,为患者提出的治疗方法而不是有关如何进行治疗的信息共享来理解整合。患者感到卫生专业人员之间缺乏沟通和信息共享。经验教训:卫生专业人员是综合护理的驱动力。在我们的研究中,所有医疗服务模式的综合护理率均较低。目前,在澳大利亚很少有奖励措施来实现综合护理。局限性:有限的资源研究仅在有限的地理区域内检查了64家资助诊所中的6家。数据仅由一名研究人员编码。未来研究的建议:在多大程度上对资源和基础设施支持在GP超级诊所内不同位置的PHC模型中的整合或阻碍进行了一致的审查?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号