...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science >An Analysis of the Precautionary Principles and Its Adaptation in International, Regional and National Laws
【24h】

An Analysis of the Precautionary Principles and Its Adaptation in International, Regional and National Laws

机译:预防原则及其在国际,区域和国家法律中的适用范围分析

获取原文
           

摘要

There is risk in every human activity. Statistics indicate that these risks are earth bound. Arguments as to whether policies meant to check and control these risks based on scientific evidence or on mere suspicion of risks have formed the subject of debate in many international conferences. Some persons agree that decisions to protect/prevent risk must be based on clear evidence of risk, others believe that mere suspicion with or without any clear evidence of risk is enough to warrant such policies. Risk is measured not only by positive knowledge of quantifiable but also by the degree of uncertainty or lack of knowledge about a possible hazard… On the continuum, between, a merely speculative risk and a conclusively demonstrated one lies a vast stretch of undemonstrated, un-quantified but scientifically plausible risk. Within that zone, the risk of harm is real so long as safety is unproven. It is this broad spectrum of potential risk, beyond that which is clearly identifiable and preventable that the precautionary principles, the roots of which lie in the environmental movements of the 1970s, seek to mitigate. This work set out to examine the precautionary principle as an environmental policy, its origin, meaning, importance and adaptation in international, regional, and domestic Laws. This study applied desk approach in generating data for the study. The result indicates that though the principle has become an established principle of environmental law particularly at international level, it is yet to be legitimately invoked and applied by most national laws.
机译:人类的每项活动都有风险。统计数据表明,这些风险是现实的。在许多国际会议上,关于政策是基于科学证据还是仅基于风险怀疑来检查和控制这些风险的争论已经成为争论的主题。有些人同意保护/预防风险的决定必须以明确的风险证据为基础,而另一些人则认为,仅凭怀疑就可以拥有或没有任何明确的风险证据就可以采取这种政策。风险不仅通过可量化的积极知识来衡量,而且还通过不确定性程度或对可能的危害的知识的缺乏程度来衡量。在连续性上,仅是投机性风险和最终证明的风险之间存在着大量未说明的,未描述的风险。量化但科学上合理的风险。在该区域内,只要安全性未经证实,就有遭受伤害的危险。正是这种广泛的潜在风险,除了可以明显识别和预防的潜在风险之外,预防原则的根源在于1970年代的环境运动,力图减轻这种风险。这项工作着手研究作为环境政策的预防原则,其起源,含义,重要性以及在国际,区域和国内法律中的适应性。这项研究采用案头方法为研究生成数据。结果表明,尽管该原则已成为环境法的既定原则,特别是在国际一级,但大多数国家法律仍未对其进行合法引用和应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号